The secret to Overunity

[blueplanet]

I suggest we read less textbook. And read more Tesla's literature. Reading too much textbook is bad for our brain and for our future generations.

In your text book, we are brainwashed to believe that increase in voltage will always come with decrease in current. This is a condition to make sure that you will always obey the laws of thermodynamics.

Conductive current can be ZERO. In electrostatic condition, higher voltage unfortunately means higher energy. Electrostatic condition does not need to mean a DC. What you need is to find a circuit with no conductive current. This circuit does not have to be Leydon jar or whatever. I understand such a circuit is difficult to find in your text book.

[blueplanet]

In our text book, we have learned that Power = voltage x current. This means that, if current is zero, power is zero. Now, do you agree that we can save the world now?

(PS. I am afraid I need to be a bit sarcastic.)

[sm0ky2]

Let's take it a step further and examine the situation when we have
1-2Mv potential
Even at microAmperes,
What is the power level of a discharge?


Is this 'static'?


Not to mention, at those voltages, energy density is so great
that we begin to affect physical matter itself.
This bridges the gap between electric theory and atomic physics.
All of our equations change at these voltages.

[blueplanet]

This is static.
At this voltage, the air will be potentially subject to dielectric breakdown.
I don't know whether you want to talk about open circuit or closed circuit.

Let's take it a step further and examine the situation when we have
1-2Mv potential
Even at microAmperes,
What is the power level of a discharge?


Is this 'static'?


Not to mention, at those voltages, energy density is so great
that we begin to affect physical matter itself.
This bridges the gap between electric theory and atomic physics.
All of our equations change at these voltages.

[sm0ky2]

"Subject To losses"?
That's your explanation?


Power is power. V*I


Whatever is lost after that is subtracted from the total.
It doesn't change the total energy involved.


At what size does a static-electric generator
Equal to the power of a conventional steam-electric generator?


And how much "energy" has to be put into each to achieve this power?


"Static" is only static until you allow it to move.
In the same manner that the potential energy of a battery is "static".
The same can be said of any capacitor.


The condenser can dump 100% of its energy at one time.
The 'actual current' is a large spike. The 'average current over time'
Is the value commonly used, this is why it is often micro amps in quantity.
Instantaneous current is all induction cares about.
This is an important distinction when dealing with high frequencies.


You can melt steel with a 'static' discharge.
To do this with a conventional generator connected to an arc welder
Requires exponentially greater quantities of energy.


The math is available for both of these situations.


If we take an absolute value for the energy required, it becomes apparent that
Our conventional generator and arc welder are less than 1% efficient.