Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

Started by Zeitmaschine, December 21, 2017, 12:05:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

Void: »The fact that they do seem to have dropped those devices for several years now and have moved into something completely different which involves a new chemical process for electrolysis [...] Kapanadze on the other hand has shown apparent self runners up close with no (detectable) connection to the grid on a number of occasions«

Something completely different? What if they generate the electricity needed for the electrolysis for free, just pretending a new chemical process? And if the Kapanadze device works, then why of all things the Barbosa-Leal device should not?

EVOLUÇÕES HIDROGÁS: »This innovative process for obtaining hydrogen makes viable technical, economic and environmental issues, since, among its main factors, it does not use electricity, since the energy required to break the water molecule is provided by the very chemical reaction«

They should win the Nobel Prize for that, because in essence it says, a newly discovered chemical reaction provides free energy.


THE CONDUCTIVE INTERCONNECTION ELEMENT

WO2013104042A1, Portuguese: »Um diagrama mostra a indução 6 ao redor do núcleo "X" da bobina 1. Com a indução ocorre a circulação da corrente elétrica 7 no elo/espira condutor 4, atraindo os elétrons da terra, através do membro condutor 5, para o campo magnético do captor, onde os elétrons se juntam com a corrente gerada por indução no elo/espira condutor 4 circulando entre os poios magnéticos norte e sul.«

Translation with comments: »A diagram shows the induction 6 around the core "X" of the coil 1 [PRIMARY COIL ON AN IRON CORE]. With the induction occurs the circulation of electric current 7 in the loop coil conductor 4 [LIKE SHORTED ARC WELDER TRANSFORMER], attracting the electrons of the earth, through the conductor 5 [GROUNDING], to the magnetic field of the captor, where the electrons join [WHY SHOULD THE ELECTRONS DO THAT?] with the current generated by induction in the loop coil conductor 4 circulating between the North and South magnetic poles [OF THE IRON CORE].«

WO2013104042A1, Portuguese: »O equipamento objeto da presente invenção funciona da seguinte forma: o dispositivo gerador de campo eletromagnético ao ser alimentado por uma fonte de energia elétrica, produz um campo eletromagnético que induz uma corrente elétrica no elemento condutor em circuito fechado em si mesmo, criando uma interação um entre os poios magnéticos do equipamento e os poios magnéticos da terra, passando a haver - através de atração e repulsão eletromagnética - um fornecimento infindável de elétrons da terra para o elemento condutor em circuito fechado em si mesmo, que é ligado a uma malha de aterramento, através do elemento condutor de interligação. Os elétrons atraídos se somam à corrente presente que circula no elemento condutor em circuito fechado em si mesmo, de onde é disponibilizada energia elétrica para alimentação de cargas de elevadas potências, embora o equipamento objeto da presente invenção seja alimentado com uma pequena potência. Desse modo, de maneira vantajosa, o equipamento objeto da presente invenção revela-se um captor de elétrons da terra, para geração de energia elétrica.«

Translation with comments: »The object equipment of the present invention operates as follows: the electromagnetic field generating device [TRANSFORMER] to be powered by a power source, produces an electromagnetic field that induces an electric current in the conducting element in a closed circuit in itself [OK, BUT AC NOT DC IS NEEDED FOR THAT], creating an interaction between one of the magnetic poles of the equipment and the magnetic poles of the earth, [STRANGE, MAGNETIC GROUNDING??], passing there - through electromagnetic [NOT ELECTROSTATIC??] attraction and repulsion - an endless ground supply of electrons to the conductive element in a closed circuit in itself, which is connected to a grounding grid through the conductive element of interconnection [WHAT KIND OF ELEMENT COULD THAT BE??]. The attracted electrons are added to the current flowing in this conductive member closed looped in itself [LIKE ARC WELDER TRANSFORMER], where it is available for power supply of high power loads while the equipment object of the present invention is powered with a small power [OVERUNITY]. Thus, advantageously, the apparatus object of the present invention discloses an earth electron trap, for generating electric energy.«

Therefore, what is a »conductive element of interconnection«, the »elemento condutor de interligação«? One conductive element is the closed loop. The other conductive element is the one that makes the interconnection between the closed loop and the ground, hence called »interligação«. If this element would be a simple connection between the closed loop and the ground wire, then why call it »elemento«? In the patent drawings that element is marked with concentric circles; therefore it must be something special. Since the electrons from ground are attracted in order to be injected and to cycle in the closed loop, it can't be a capacitor (electrostatic induction), it has to be something that conducts electrons, but nevertheless it is not a straightforward galvanic (metallic) connection. Could that »something« be a diode? A diode that can reverse its polarity according to the 50Hz or 100Hz grid frequency? When a positive electrostatic field attracts electrons from ground into the closed loop through a diode, the electrons have no other choice as to stay in that closed loop (for at least one alternating cycle) until the diode's polarity is reversed. Sounds logical, but what's the catch? A diode that can reverse its polarity has to be constructed of two thyristors (each 3 pin) connected back to back on heat sinks suitable for a ground current of 22 amps inclusive wiring. I can't see such a thing on Kapanadze's work bench in 2004 video. Then could that »elemento« be a spark gap? A spark firing with 22 amps would for sure create a lot of noise (given the spark gap would fire at all). There is no such noise to be heard, so we can rule out that »elemento« too. What's left?

Interestingly in the Barbosa-Leal demonstration video (the disappeared one), the closed loop is made of heavy wire 240mm2 measuring hundreds of amperes and a lot of heat, whereas the ground wire is made of a rather thin green wire. Does this suggest, that here the electrons from ground are attracted once - without generating much amps and heat in the ground wire - and then kept circulating in the loop more than one alternating cycle? Don't know.


PROJECT BRAINSTORM

But what about a coil? Could the »elemento condutor de interligação« be a coil of some sort? Let's say, the high voltage that attracts and repels electrons from ground initially works at 100Hz, whereas the ground wire is wrapped around an iron core with a magnetic field oscillating at 50Hz; namely the iron core of the transformer we already have. Or, optionally - also called vice versa -, we could wrap it around a 100Hz transformer and the counterpart works at 50Hz. The coil then is actually an additional open secondary coil of a transformer, one side connected to ground and one side to the closed looped secondary. An open secondary coil generates voltage, that means the closed high current circuit is not connected to dead ground but to a ground biased with voltage. Here the theoretical question arises: A non-closed secondary coil of a transformer generates alternating (high) voltage, hence there is a surplus of electrons (negative) on one end of the wire and there is a lack of electrons (positive) on the other end, alternating at 50Hz. But what if one end of the coil is connected to ground? Since ground provides an unlimited supply of electrons, there can never be a lack of electrons on that end; that end can never be positive. Does that mean, the other end of the coil - the open one - can supply a surplus of electrons, because that end is now more negative (ultra negative) than the normal ground negative, as compensation for the positive end forced to be normal negative? If so, and that secondary coil is a high voltage coil, providing lots of electrons to be injected in the closed 2 to 4 windings circuit, then could that mean, we can mix high voltage low current with low voltage high current and get as result high voltage with high current through the magnetic field of the iron core? Could it be, high voltage 100Hz is not (exclusively) needed to create an electrostatic attraction via a spark gap, but to route the ground wire through the secondary coil of that transformer? Two transformers, one pumps electrons from ground, the other captures them? If the electrons from ground are attracted by means of (through) a high voltage coil, then of course a thin green ground wire would be sufficient. Though it's unclear, why Kapanadze needs a thick one. Could it happen, Kapanadze's »so simple you'll laugh« is not simple enough? Can we make it even simpler?

As we can see, the closed looped coil conductor 4 is marked with a plus-sign, meaning a positive voltage has to be connected to that coil; »condutor 4 polarizado com tensão«. Does it make sense to connect a positive voltage to a coil connected at the same time to ground? Not if connected to ground directly, but what if connected to ground through the coil of a magnetic field generating transformer? The higher the voltage generated by the secondary coil when grounded on one end, the more surplus electrons (negativity) compared to ground will appear on the other end. Hence it is easy to attract and repel electrons from ground, it needs just a high voltage transformer with its secondary coil single-sided connected to ground. The other, more difficult (non-obvious) thing is, to do something useful with those attracted electrons. But at least we are still within the scope of an odd connected three-phase transformer. No rocket science needed so far.

A very interesting thing here is this: If the closed loop is not ground but positive and it can (but it is not imperative) be connected to phase of the grid (the polarized version), then, since we know for sure the grid frequency is 50Hz, in the non-polarized version the closed loop has to be connected to a voltage at 50Hz (if at all), which leaves for the ground transformer most likely only the choice of 100Hz, if we assume that those two frequencies are involved. On the other hand, if the closed loop, namely the one that comes in shape of the copper pipe, is connected to a high voltage transformer, it would make sense to insulate it, like seen in the wooden box demonstration, but connecting it at the same time to grid, should not be the best idea. Besides, what is the polarized version good for? I don't get it.

Well, I'm still not convinced that a spark gap is needed; looking at the epoxy resin I rather tend to say no. Also I have no idea whether the high voltage pulses should be sharp or not, or if there should be ionization or not (ionization in epoxy resin?), or if there is ionization but as a by-product and not really needed, or whether cosmoLV knows how the device works but spreads lots of disinformation deliberately, or if he just think he knows, but he does not really know or not fully. It's very difficult to stay on track regarding this subject and not to diverge from the correct path when turning that whole stuff upside down every few days. When we finally have a working setup, then we will know for certain what was real information and what was just mumbo jumbo and distraction; guess ninety-nine percent disinfo at the minimum. I'm looking forward to it.


core

So look at the problem from a different direction, because in the last 7 years basically every type of coil configuration has been used. Be honest, nobody has really gotten any closer to a device or even a whiff of free energy. Remember the first post on the original TK thread? yep everyone is still there, same goes for the Barbosa & Leal device.


Pretend for one minute the a specific coil combination is not the solution. However lets think in terms of amplifying the power in the core material (iron) without increasing the core size. A current will flow in a magnetized core, imagine if you could amplify this current. What would be the result? This is no more Pie in the sky then the last 7 years of failed speculation.


Some dude on the Clemente Figuera thread started putting this idea out there but he/she never returned.


-Core

core

..... So I am saying FE is not found in a coil or coils but is hidden in the irons ability to absorb more or draw more energy on its own with the aid of a magnetic field.


-Core


forest

Imagine what would we have if we could arrange a meeting of McFarland Cook,Figuera,Hubbard,Hendershot,Kapanadze,Barbosa and Leal with little help of Tesla ?


Actually what I read here is exact implementation of Tesla method of pulling energy from ambient medium. Do you realize that Tito already described the capacitive version of this method (somehow used by Hendershot also and probably in Tesla mystic Piearce Arrow car ? ) ?


Explain please why we have voltage (potential) difference between Earth ground and the upper atmosphere ?  Something which Don Smith funny explained ? When ground is unity then everything above ground is overunity ;-) That maybe important question to consider WHY ?