Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

[forest]

Right Void, not in the world filled with money and greed. Such presentation should be back up with a huge interest to avoid "unauthorized replication"   

[Hoppy]

....I can only conclude that the vast majority of people
in this world are just not interested in facts and reality, and actually often become quite upset and angry if other
people point out how their beliefs or point of view is at odds with facts and reality.

That's the crux of the problem Void! We unfortunately now live in a world where truth has become illusive by design in order for the most powerful in societies to exert control over masses. The fight for truth becomes so difficult that most of us are forced into living in a bubble of distorted reality engendering false beliefs.

[AlienGrey]

Feedback I asked if any one knows the meaning of the abbreviation COP, no one replayed so why bother ??
What is coefficient of performance (COP)? definition and meaning ...
www.businessdictionary.com/definition/coefficient-of-performance-COP.html

Ratio of work or useful output to the amount of work or energy input, used generally as a measure of the energy-efficiency of air conditioners, space heaters and other cooling and heating devices. ... Higher the COP, higher the efficiency of the equipment.

allen

[Jeg]

I believe that Fernandez discovered something interesting but the explanation has a misconception. When P2 gets involved by feeding it with current from a source then P2 becomes an "original" flux changer. So the output coil "Sec"will also oppose to P2 change and the two magnetic fields (Sec, P2) will not be added as it was proposed. But this doesn't change the fact that the output will be a dc signal as he said. Does this rectified magnetic field is the answer? Does this effect opens the door to OU if in resonance? I don't know, but that is the meaning of experimentation.

ps. By the way Accula has already published an oscilator of this kind. Three or four mosfets at the primary side, dc across the output.

[tinman]

I officially give up on trying to have 'reasonable' discussions in these forums. 

No matter how carefully a person might point out facts and evidence, or a clear lack of evidence
as the case may be, many people in these forums just *believe* what they want to believe regardless
of conflicting facts and evidence, or regardless of a lack of any real evidence to back up what they are saying.
I am talking about people on both sides of the 'belief fence' here.

There seems little chance of someone ever getting even close to the truth when a person is blinded by
presumptions and beliefs, and when they are unable to even tell the difference between their beliefs and
presumptions and things which are actually supportable with real world evidence and facts. If someone does point
out actual facts and evidence, or points out a lack of reasonable evidence supporting someone's claims, you are
often viewed as 'being very negative', regardless of how carefully and politely you point things out. When I look
around me and see everything that is going on in this world right now, I can only conclude that the vast majority of people
in this world are just not interested in facts and reality, and actually often become quite upset and angry if other
people point out how their beliefs or point of view is at odds with facts and reality.

It is of course completely reasonable to ask someone who is claiming to know how to produce a COP > 1
to show a clear demonstration of this COP > 1; but, things being what they are in this world, it would be very
foolish to hold your breath waiting for said person to actually back up their claims here with some sort of reasonable
and clear demonstration. It would in fact be a very rare event indeed if someone were to actually back up
claims here of a COP > 1 setup with a clear and proper demonstration, even though in the very least such a demonstration
should be a given requirement for making such a claim in a forum like this, given all the false and mistaken claims
about 'OU' people keep making in these forums and on Youtube etc., on a regular basis.
Good luck guys.

All the best...

Couldn't agree more Void 

As you may have noticed,i have been absent from the forums for quite some time now.

I am only here now because Chet pointed out a post via email,and so i came to have a look.

I see most are still lost when it comes to understanding induced EMF and currents,and what the outcome-or bi-products of either are.

So many still believe that the magnetic field is the master,when in fact it is a hindrance-->a bi-product of the flow of current through a conductor.

Only when people understand that it is the electric field of a primary coil that induces an EMF across a secondary coil,will advances be made.


Brad