Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy

Started by Zeitmaschine, December 21, 2017, 12:05:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ariovaldo

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on January 02, 2018, 09:10:27 AM
sm0ky2, that's why the phrase »or vice versa« is frequently used in this thread.


THE FOUR-CYCLE ENGINE

We use two transformers of a three-phase transformer. The primary coil of the first one is connected to 50Hz grid, generating a magnetic field. The secondary coil of that transformer is connected to ground and shorted. It is not shorted directly, but through a coil of the second transformer. That second transformer generates high voltage, for some reason at 100 Hz. That high voltage generates an electric field and ionization close to that shorted coil carrying the 50Hz current generated by the first transformer. Using a spark gap or not, what could happen? What could happen if we use all three transformers? The middle one generates the magnetic field and runs at 50Hz, the two outer ones provide the high voltage at 100Hz - or vice versa. What could happen, if the ground wire connected to the closed loop itself is influenced by an alternating electric field?

Unbelievable, how many pages can be written in circles about a device consistent of almost nothing.

It is still unclear at this point if a spark gap is really required or not. I can't see how a spark gap could ever work on a permanent basis when casted in epoxy resin, like the Barbosa-Leal device is. Should we assume there is a spark gap hidden in the circuit breaker or in one of the two surge arresters? Or is there an electronic one? But if we don't need one at all, then the better. Maybe Kapanadze's spark gap is just another pitfall - or he used one needlessly without knowing. Also it is still unclear at this point whether the surplus of electrons should be collected from ground or rather from ionized air.

Looking at the illustrations below, we know for sure now why a frequency doubler circuit is needed in order to generate the high voltage that attracts the electrons. It works (if we should ever succeed) like a four-cycle engine. The idea is to electrostatically attract and repel the electrons in a closed circuit in harmony with the magnetic field, not contrary to it, making one field cancel the other. So I think this is a physical configuration issue between the magnetic field(s) - inductance, and the electrostatic field(s) - capacitance. The Barbosa-Leal patent says »at least one device for generating an electromagnetic field (1) - powered by an electricity source«; that's an ordinary iron core wound with a primary coil. The secondary coil is the closed loop with 2 to 4 windings, generating heat (the copper pipe). This coil is not completely covered by the magnetic (and electric) field because we can see a large part of it sticking out of the device. So far we have here an ordinary transformer with a shorted secondary coil. That secondary coil is connected to ground. Exactly the same configuration like the welder above, which can turn the meter in reverse.

When an electric field attracts electrons (from ground) then it attracts electrons towards itself; the field generates a hot spot of electrons. Perhaps that could mean, we have to inject (»high voltage is injector«) those electrons directly into the magnetic field (»combustion chamber«) generated by the primary coil (»low voltage is piston«). Thus, it could be a good idea to have the ground wire connected near the magnetic field coil, not at an arbitrary spot somewhere on the closed loop. When this closed loop is made of a coaxial cable (wound around an iron core, magnetized by the primary coil), the shielding connected to high voltage attracts (or repels) electrons, but on one side of the circuit the electrons are always attracted (or repelled) in the wrong direction, the electrons do not move in a full circle. This can't work. What's missing?


There was no spark gap in those units.....

sm0ky2

Quote from: Belfior on January 03, 2018, 03:16:49 AM
it is not only a switch, since it provides a massive number of frequencies and their harmonics. This is an advantage if you mean to bounce these in a coil


Yes this is true, we can filter them on the back end.
However, Foyer transform shows us these can be
viewed as a single combined frequency.
some add others cancel, and so the effects these have
on induction, capacitance, and impedance are the same
as if the simplified frequency were sent through the
circuit by itself.
what is 'missing' in the simplified version is radiation
and sound external to the circuit.





I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

Zeitmaschine

ariovaldo, »There was no spark gap in those units.....«

And also no diode bridge (single diodes)? Would be strange, since the frequency doubler circuit under Stepanov's cardboard box is surely not there for nothing. Did this dismantled unit work once? So you got a working OU device and destroyed it?

ariovaldo on March 01, 2014, 05:30 PM: »I'm from Brazil and tested the equipment by myself and I know exactly what the equipment has inside. The tests that I conducted didn't show good results, and I'm 95% sure this equipment is fake [...]«

Or didn't it work at all and therefore those images do not show a real Barbosa-Leal device from the inside? Then what's the point?

I can see an arc welder like transformer. The device for generating an electromagnetic field powered by an electricity source is the toroidal coil, the closed looped secondary coil is going through it. But we know, without additional means this will not work; why should it? So, are there any pictures showing some other parts of that unit?

So far, based on all available information, the theory is this:

a) Barbosa-Leal device equals arc welder transformer.
b) Arc welder transformer draws energy from grid when the secondary coil is shorted.
c) Barbosa-Leal device draws energy from ground by means of the shorted secondary coil.
d) Arc welder transformer can draw energy also from ground in some special cases.
e) Kapanadze and Stepanov devices are basically the same like Barbosa-Leal device.

The principle of work should be: Electrons from ground or from ionized air are injected into a closed looped secondary coil, amplifying there (for free) an already present current generated by a primary magnetic field.

Does sound simple, how to make it?


THE CLOSED NON-CLOSED CIRCUIT

In order to generate a magnetic field and heat, electrons need to move in a closed circuit (don't know why). But what could happen when the electrons move in a closed circuit and that circuit is in fact not permanently closed (illustration below)? The circuit is rather closed time-dependent (cosmoLV: »always this is manipulation with time«); we utilizing the forth dimension, so to say. A switch (of some kind) opens the closed loop, that's the secondary coil of a transformer. A positive electric field attracts the electrons from ground through the loop (1), so the electrons are all collected on the end of the wire. Then the circuit is switched over, therefore that end of the wire containing the surplus of electrons connects to ground, whereas a negative electric field (don't know if this negative field is really needed) repels now the electrons at the other end of the wire pushing them back into the ground through the loop (2). This is repeated for each half-wave (3 and 4) of the magnetic field generated by the primary coil (not drawn in this illustration). So, for the electrons it looks like a closed circuit although it is an open circuit. When the magnetic field works at 50Hz (and also the switch), then the electric field has to be 100Hz, phase-locked of course. Don't know how to do this practically, but at least the theory is a bit outside of the box.

The question here: Is it really necessary to have a toggle switch, like transistors or thyristors, or could this toggle switch be replaced by two coils (chokes) of some sort? The magnetic field works at 50Hz sinusoidal wave, the electric field could be sharp pulsed (cosmoLV: »most important thing is to generate sharp pulses«). That means, a choke could work as a filter, conducting the 50Hz current without apparent resistance, but the apparent resistance would be high for the current generated by the sharp electric field pulses. As we can see, the diagram of the arc welder from page one shows a choke connected in series with the secondary coil through the diode bridge and it is suitable for high currents. It conducts 100Hz DC without much resistance, but it blocks the sharp pulses generated by the sparks when the circuit is shorted (welding).


ahem ... just in case some detailed images here do not fit neatly onto your screen, use Firefox with Stylish plugin, create new style with the following lines (change numbers at your convenience):

@-moz-document domain("overunity.com") {
  div img {
    max-width: 800px;
    height: auto;
  }
  .post {
    max-width: 835px;
    text-align: justify;
  }
}

jojo500

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on January 04, 2018, 06:20:32 AM
ariovaldo, »There was no spark gap in those units.....«

And also no diode bridge (single diodes)? Would be strange, since the frequency doubler circuit under Stepanov's cardboard box is surely not there for nothing. Did this dismantled unit work once? So you got a working OU device and destroyed it?

ariovaldo on March 01, 2014, 05:30 PM: »I'm from Brazil and tested the equipment by myself and I know exactly what the equipment has inside. The tests that I conducted didn't show good results, and I'm 95% sure this equipment is fake [...]«

Or didn't it work at all and therefore those images do not show a real Barbosa-Leal device from the inside? Then what's the point?

I can see an arc welder like transformer. The device for generating an electromagnetic field powered by an electricity source is the toroidal coil, the closed looped secondary coil is going through it. But we know, without additional means this will not work; why should it? So, are there any pictures showing some other parts of that unit?

So far, based on all available information, the theory is this:

a) Barbosa-Leal device equals arc welder transformer.
b) Arc welder transformer draws energy from grid when the secondary coil is shorted.
c) Barbosa-Leal device draws energy from ground by means of the shorted secondary coil.
d) Arc welder transformer can draw energy also from ground in some special cases.
e) Kapanadze and Stepanov devices are basically the same like Barbosa-Leal device.

The principle of work should be: Electrons from ground or from ionized air are injected into a closed looped secondary coil, amplifying there (for free) an already present current generated by a primary magnetic field.

Does sound simple, how to make it?


THE CLOSED NON-CLOSED CIRCUIT

In order to generate a magnetic field and heat, electrons need to move in a closed circuit (don't know why). But what could happen when the electrons move in a closed circuit and that circuit is in fact not permanently closed (illustration below)? The circuit is rather closed time-dependent (cosmoLV: »always this is manipulation with time«); we utilizing the forth dimension, so to say. A switch (of some kind) opens the closed loop, that's the secondary coil of a transformer. A positive electric field attracts the electrons from ground through the loop (1), so the electrons are all collected on the end of the wire. Then the circuit is switched over, therefore that end of the wire containing the surplus of electrons connects to ground, whereas a negative electric field (don't know if this negative field is really needed) repels now the electrons at the other end of the wire pushing them back into the ground through the loop (2). This is repeated for each half-wave (3 and 4) of the magnetic field generated by the primary coil (not drawn in this illustration). So, for the electrons it looks like a closed circuit although it is an open circuit. When the magnetic field works at 50Hz (and also the switch), then the electric field has to be 100Hz, phase-locked of course. Don't know how to do this practically, but at least the theory is a bit outside of the box.

The question here: Is it really necessary to have a toggle switch, like transistors or thyristors, or could this toggle switch be replaced by two coils (chokes) of some sort? The magnetic field works at 50Hz sinusoidal wave, the electric field could be sharp pulsed (cosmoLV: »most important thing is to generate sharp pulses«). That means, a choke could work as a filter, conducting the 50Hz current without apparent resistance, but the apparent resistance would be high for the current generated by the sharp electric field pulses. As we can see, the diagram of the arc welder from page one shows a choke connected in series with the secondary coil through the diode bridge and it is suitable for high currents. It conducts 100Hz DC without much resistance, but it blocks the sharp pulses generated by the sparks when the circuit is shorted (welding).


ahem ... just in case some detailed images here do not fit neatly onto your screen, use Firefox with Stylish plugin, create new style with the following lines (change numbers at your convenience):

@-moz-document domain("overunity.com") {
  div img {
    max-width: 800px;
    height: auto;
  }
  .post {
    max-width: 835px;
    text-align: justify;
  }
}

one thing on all the devices from tariel , ruslan , akula, barbosa always make me wonder .. most of them use a relativ long cable going from the device to the groundpoint . some of the gys made a big deal about a perfekt ground .. at the same time they lay servral meters of cable in between it .
i did some tests with some intresting results not to long ago .. how ever there is something to look over

all the best

plaxius

Quote from: sm0ky2 on January 02, 2018, 05:13:25 PM
The spark gap is simply a switch
It is often replaced by a transistor
or similar state-dependent semiconductor


FALSE !!! Please .. see the video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJEoKM0aOls&feature=youtu.be