Nathan Coppedge perpetual motion, real evidence

[NathanCoppedge]

I have just done some internet search on your machine but I have not seen any evidence of perpetual motion. I might be wrong.

The following Youtube video may show you how easy it is to transition between one modular unit and the next in the diagram that started this thread.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpC09iSiMbY

Just imagine that it has the kind of momentum that's been proven in the Successful Over-Unity Experiment 1 (my primary experiment).

Imagine that its allowed to move, and that the marble is much, much taller. Now do you see? It works!

Because:

1. It has natural momentum at every point.
2. There is no additional necessary change in altitude.
3. It doesn't use energy.

[blueplanet]

.....
Imagine that its allowed to move, and that the marble is much, much taller. Now do you see? It works!

Because:

1. It has natural momentum at every point.
2. There is no additional necessary change in altitude.
3. It doesn't use energy.

What allows it to move then?
Momentum means force. If there is any so-called natural momentum at any point, what is this source of this force?
This force must come from somewhere. But you have not mentioned it.

[NathanCoppedge]

I have just done some internet search on your machine but I have not seen any evidence of perpetual motion. I might be wrong.

In my humble opinion, your machine should not break any laws of physics, except for the second law of thermodynamics.

Well, the problem with your statement is that usually only fakes run that long. A real machine performing work will break down unless it is built very solidly.

[NathanCoppedge]

What allows it to move then? ...
This force must come from somewhere. But you have not mentioned it.

The force comes from the heavier counterweight meeting with little resistance from the marble / mobile weight when the marble / mobile weight is supported like a wheel.

Those who know wheels work know the force necessary to move them is equal to 1/2 m * distance = 1/2 the mass * whatever distance it travels, in other words, 1/2 the mass if purely horizontal.

Therefore, an equal or slightly heavier counterweight can actually perform work based on this difference in resistance.

That is the theory, and I have proven it can create upward and downward motion. I would love to hear of people replicating my experiments, but apparently few have tried, or few have tried adequately.

However, it should be rather easy, for a change, to prove that my experiments are accurate. One must simply follow the ratios in the diagram: 1X standard marble's worth of mass as compared to a counterweight of 1 standard marble, 1 U.S. quarter, 1 U.S. penny, and 5 inches of duct tape, effective unweighted long-end leverage mass (while hinged) of about 0.5X a standard marble mass, leverage ratio of 10.8X - 14X on the long end to 6.25X at midpoint of mass on the short end. Ultra-smooth, ultra straight (as straight and smooth as possible) slotted track, with upward angle of less than 1 degree, with lever angle modified to suit whatever works.

Someone let me know if you do this experiment. I would be overjoyed to see your video on YouTube replicating the experiment.

It is simple... And, over-unity I might add, for a change. In my view at least it is over-unity. Someone else is free to have a different theory, but electricity, batteries, elastic, etc is not one of them.

[Belfior]

second law is broken already. Only debunkers pull that one out every now and then. I could make up a law like that. Here we go. "In a universe that has nothing, there is no gravity between particles".

Other laws are used also on false pretenses like energy conservation. They say "you cannot create energy from nothing, because energy can't be created or destroyed". What the law actually means is that all energy has been created already. You can only transform it from one form to another. So if I put x amount of energy to a system that creates imbalance, nature can use 2x of energy to try to balance shit out. Then if I design my device properly then 2x of my input energy is trapped into my system.

Then people ask "well where does the energy come from?". It does not really matter, because I just know that Nature will do this. It can come from Gaia's arse if it works. That is not my problem but Nature's problem and if the device works, then all is good.

My opinion is that it is the event of transformation where this is actually possible, if your device is designed properly. When energy changes from form to another there is a window to get more on the output. Just like in a transformer. No electrons go from primary to secondary and still there is power in the secondary. It is because primary creates changes in flux in the core and the secondary sees the flux changing and transform that to electricity. So the problem that is left is that how can you make the secondary see more flux, faster change in flux or what ever you can think of to fake it to the secondary.

Just take a neodymium magnet and make it face an iron core with a coil around it. The flux from thew magnet goes all the way through the core. This is btw a magnetic field takes a shitload of electricity to produce. Then use like a 3V DC motor to turn a round plate with holes in it between the magnet and the core. The plate should be copper&steel&aluminium plate glued together if you can't afford galfenol. This will stop the field and let it pass to the core when ever there is a hole in the plate. You will get plenty more than to run the small motor.

At some point you will start getting a counter acting field from the core&coil that hits the magnet, but does it really matter? Make one pickup coil CW and other CCW or figure it out some other way, if it even matters