Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Seeking OverUnity through Resonant Inductive Coupling

Started by CoastieRM2, January 16, 2018, 12:27:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

The common electrical theory tells us that, at resonant frequency
inductance falls off completely, and that there would be no flux.
I find this to not be true, at least in practice. This may be because of
small variance in the 'true' resonance conditions between coils and core.
Like, we may not be able to ever match them perfectly enough to
reach a state of pure electrical oscillations with no magnetic field.
(I assumed at first this occurs in a lab, but have not seen it,
   as it turns out, the best labs cannot do it)


So when we build a device, like a joule thief, or whatever
and try to bring it close to resonance, we might can match the
self-resonant frequency of the coils, or of the core, but both might
not have a common factor. (within our available range)
Even when we maticulously engineer them to be this way, it may not
be possible to have the level of precision to achieve the 'ideal situation'.


So, when we expect to find no magnetic flux, because there is no
resistance to electric flux, there is in fact, magnetic flux.


We can create an ideal situation when there is just one inductor and core
and in this state theory holds true.
The inductor stops working at pure resonance.
We have to actually use it slightly lower or higher than its self resonant freq.


However, when there is a secondary, or multiple inductive couplings, we do not
achieve this state.
Undoubtedly there exists variables we cannot remove, or have not yet identified.
Self-interference may be the cause. The dynamics of which, I don't think are very
well understood.


The same occurs when the inductive coupling is resonant, outside the self-resonance
of the core, or coils. (I.e. other resonant frequencies)
Tesla may have been the only person that truly understood that relationship.


When we think about "what" we are actually doing here
We are trying to match impedance with inductance.
In two ideal states both approach zero or infinity.
We have either no flux or no change in current.
In the latter, Einstein gives some relativistic perspective
However this violates Maxwell


Clearly, our electrical theory falls short.
Experiment, experiment, experiment
That is all we can do.
The answer lies somewhere between input and output
Which varies with frequency. (comparison of many resonant couplings)
Millions of research dollars are currently being spent trying to unravel this.
But it seems we are not much closer now than we were in the 70's.



I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

sm0ky2

My thoughts are that Einstein was wrong, at least as it pertains
to the propagation velocity of the magnetic field.


I say this because much of Einstein's work was based on
Maxwell's work. Therefore, if one contradicts the other,
both cannot be correct.


There are other unrelated experiments that seem to verify this.
And if we assume that the magnetic field propagates instantaneously
rather than at c, the real-world situation is expressed more closely
by the mathematical representation.
This, coupled with the time-independent function of the magnetic field,
makes more sense to me.

I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

CoastieRM2

Aye smOky2,
it is my prevailing thought, the one that keeps me awake at night, that there is an answer that we must keep searching for.  Hopefully, I have set a course that will assist in finding the clues that will eventually enable discovery.  In the mean time, back to the build.

CoastieRM2


Belfior

Oh Wow! I thought I had achieved something today when I got my new table drill mounted securely on a wooden slab with rubber feet under it.

That looks like a work of art!

PS. if you have hundreds of ideas sometimes it feels nothing gets done and there is no progress. Then you just end up looking at videos in Youtube.

The solution is to write down all your ideas, so you don't forget the good stuff. Then do just one thing every day. It could be just ordering missing parts or wrapping one coil. This makes you go forward all the time and not just watching videos all night and then trying to sleep with the same idea in your head every night.