Successfully looped SMOT

[blueplanet]

It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn't invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It's a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.


Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson


It's all the same thing

You are right. John Searl is definitely not a scammers.

[TinselKoala]

It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn't invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It's a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.

James Maxwell
Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson
Ken Wheeler

It's all the same thing
Science does not provide an understanding of magnetism
Maxwell did, but no one understands it, even Einstein needed
help.


There may only be one person alive right now that fully gets it
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

You have just lost any credibility you may once have had. Go ahead and build your SMOT according to what you have "learned" from the Great Genius Buddhist Ken Wheeler. It will keep you occupied, and is less dangerous than playing in the street -- but will accomplish much the same thing.

[sm0ky2]

You have just lost any credibility you may once have had. Go ahead and build your SMOT according to what you have "learned" from the Great Genius Buddhist Ken Wheeler. It will keep you occupied, and is less dangerous than playing in the street -- but will accomplish much the same thing.

I can't use Ken's terminology, because he tries to coin things as his own proprietary
language. And I'm not willing to re-write physics just to incorporate his small changes
to magnetic theory.
(He is a pompous ass, self-diluted, and tries to claim everything as his own)


I do sometimes make use of his description of the magnetic meridian,
or center of magnetism, or "dielectric inertial plane".
His mathematics are solid and do not conflict with Maxwell's equations.
(except for one part which is not relevant here, and even then he proves it visually
     using a magnetic viewing tool invented by an unrelated person)
I don't care about "who he is" or what his religion is.


None of that matters in science.
Not many of the great scientists of history are what I would
consider "good people".
Most do their work for the wrong reasons, personal greed, nationalism, or pure destruction.


The only thing that matters here is what the magnetic field is/does and what WE can do with it.


Discredit the sources of knowledge if you choose to.
Einstein was a lazy slacker, a plagiarist, and had other people do a lot of his math for him.
But Einstein was (mostly) correct, and in science that is more important than personal idealism.


Who has the answer is not important
What the answer Is, is important.
There is evidence that indicates Ken didn't come up with this stuff himself
(though he claims to have)
But the work he has done as a magnitician, is invaluable to his field.
He mathematically identified the 3rd field aspect, and gives a more accurate
depiction of the 3 dimensional magnetic field than anyone before him.
Science cannot accept his theories in their current form,
and unless or until he is willing to bridge that gap,
it will probably never happen.
He just wants to sell his book, and take out his anger on the acedemics that shunned him
like a teenage schoolgirl seeking vengeance.


But that has no bearing on the actual knowledge he shares,
a lot of which he released for free, long before he ever wrote his book.
If you don't like the guy, don't buy his stuff.
You can learn what you need from his YouTube channel
or d/l a pirate copy or completely ignore him.
eventually a 'real scientist' will come along and give us a better description of
the 3rd aspect of magnetism that lies perpendicular to the magnetic polarity.


This same aspect of the meridian that I have shown you here in this thread.

[synchro1]

@Tinselkoala,

Do you feel the negative inductance measurement in this video is an indication of the presence of an increasing magnetic field in the one series bifilar coil of the "Quadfilar Spiral Torus"? We had a heated exchange about this subject last year as you probably remember.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP2xEKH4qdc&list=UUo9ItsUt0n5ayZlb5K_cwaA&index=20

[ramset]

Heated and threatening discussions here are a thing of the past.

attempts at rebooting will not go well.

Smoky2
The person you mention made claims here that many could not reproduce [with true caloric measurement ]
and he would not discuss this disparity when I called him NOR later admit he made an error with his new camera [an artifact of the imaging gave him false readings which did not prove out under scrutiny.[which was pointed out by a member presently posting in this thread ...

the claim being... a strong magnet in the  presence of Bismuth made heat due to his spinning field claims.

there were a lot of happy Bismuth and magnet salesmen...but many experimenters with lighter  wallets and sad faces...
--------------------------------------

Been a lotta bumps in this road...would be better to take a smoother friendlier path...


respectfully
Chet K