Successfully looped SMOT

[sm0ky2]

Thanks Chet,


At the risk of my "low credibility rating" forcing me to finance my own cheeseburger


Let's continue...


This next demonstration concerns gate transition.
That is, the mechanism required to leave one gate and enter the next.


That mechanism, is field compression (flux switching, named so by HJ)
And the criteria presented by the wiki link above.


I can prove that this occurs in all magnetic gates, not just the extreme values
referenced by Wikipedia, or the work of Howard Johnson.
But for now we will simply show this with the SMoT, since that was the explicit challenge.
keep in mind however, the smot is magnetically synonymous to 1/2 of a magnetic gate
so what I show with SMOT, applies to all such gates.


https://youtu.be/TWlnnk0qsS4

[sm0ky2]

This next video is an inverse-SMOT, (center-attractive smot)
and I have implemented the Howard Johnson pole-reversal.
"pole-flipping", "metamagnetism" caused by field compression.


https://youtu.be/NzBuKGlvxf8

In this set-up, gravity is employed along the 2nd track portion
The 2nd track is declining away from the field, to free the ball.
The magnets are very weak (SmCo), and wasn't quite enough kick
So, rather than continuing to make adjustments, I took a shortcut
and gave the exit ramp ~2-degree decline to allow a gravity assist.

[sm0ky2]

@chet


The spinning field claims were first made in the early 1900's
Some of the scientific publications that presented this, were
plagiarized by Ed Leedskalnin, in experiments that better prove
the effect, than Mr Wheeler has been able to show.


Mathematically, the field is moving, as the electrons that cause
the magnetic moment are in motion.
The assumptions that the 'net field' is stationary, is a macro-scale
convenience, and has little or no bearing on the reality of the field.


If you want to prove THAT—— simply try to balance a magnet in repulsion
above another magnet.
Then we can talk about whether or not the field moves.


if I were to theorize the reaction of Bismuth,
I would say that due to the bond-energy of the crystalline structure
causes reordering to be an endothermic reaction
Bismuth metal should get slightly colder when you approach its diamagnetic vector
with a magnetic field. To imagine it heating up doesn't even sound right.
There are better ways to prove the motion of magnetism, as it relates to the motion of the source.


Also, we have never achieved "full magnetization" of physical matter.
Even in neodymium, there are unordered spin-momenta, which result in incoherent magnetic moments.


why is a non-magnetic material NOT magnetic?
Because all of its tiny fields are spinning......


For there to be electromagnetism, there is first motion.

[sm0ky2]

What is the magnetic field of a piece of ionized iron?

[sm0ky2]

This SMOT is made using a very large steel ball.


This sphere is hollow, and was originally a non-magnetic 305 stainless steel.
I have restructured the crystalline structure
From Austenite to martensite
By placing it in a Leedskalnin PMH loop.


What's important here, is the large diameter of the sphere
And the effects the accelerating outer surface have on rotational momentum.
In relation to the linear displacement of the ball, through the field.


https://youtu.be/Owkz6w4AhRM


Don't worry, I'm not going to loop a smot of giant balls,
But I wanted to show you this in exaggerated form to demonstrate
the effects of changing the size of sphere in your particular design.