Successfully looped SMOT

[synchro1]

   Anyone trying to make a successfully looping SMOT,  try to also film under the table,  or use a transparent table or something.

   I have always thought that there's much easier( and maybe cheaper ) ways of making a successfully looping SMOT( if it's possible ),      i.e.  :   
      -  by using a  transparent-plastic-hose  in which the ball would run, 
      -  and maybe the number of magnets required could be reduced ,  by only having one magnet above the transparent-plastic-hose( at the end of the SMOT ) to propel the ball,  or even having it only on one side of the transparent-plastic-hose

   I also think it should be possible to loop a single ( but maybe powerful ) SMOT( or similar device ).

Here's the "Abandon all Hope" video from ViralVideoLab:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0PFA9WrHWE

[ramset]

well
if anyone can figure a way to get a magnet back into the gate with gain

Sm0ky2 can.

but I agree... as of this moment
there's no such thing as a SMOT or simple magnetic over unity toy.

Plenty have tried .

does this mean Smoky2 will be famous ??

I certainly hope so !!

I do recall a time when he did have some very good results with another type of array
but it was not repeatable at the time...

[sm0ky2]

There is only one demonstration that you should present... a successfully self-looping SMOT. But we already know that you cannot.

Because there is no such thing as a SMOT.

I also prefer to call it the SMT.


yes I "should" just do that, but then it would just be you me and my cheeseburger


I have to do this the way that I am,
because when people understand how this technology works
They can build it themselves by any design they choose.


no one has to "look under the table"
because anyone with a few magnets can go "look there it is"


if anything I have said this far, or anything I have shown is unclear
feel free to ask me to do it in a more receivable manner, or to explain anything
in more detail if is needed.


If not


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamagnetism


this is overview of a little trick HJ taught people before I was born.


If it's not real, why does it still need classification?
Why can't I tell you what you really need to know?


It doesn't matter, because we will work right around the laws
and I will teach you how to engineer your own things based on the root
not on a specific patent or secret schematic


When we examine the SMT in a frozen state during transition
with sensitive instruments, we can detect the artificial meridian
in the steel ball. And the same can be done in free space.
and the dipoles induced in the ball, change polarity twice at this meridian.
N| s-(s):n-(n) |(S)
The ball being the lowercase and the caps are the stator fields
The field induced by the N is s-n
The field induced by the (S) is (n)-(s)
The main meridian is stronger :
the sub meridians - and - are compressed (repulsion)
These are along a plane perpendicular to the inducing field
with respect to each individual stator magnet in the effective field range.


The actual field extends into the infinite realm of our universe
With ever decreasing intensity.
But for our purposes, the effective field is whatever is required to move the rotor
In our case, a steel sphere of random size, mass, density...


In the center of the steel ball is where the : artificial meridian tends to occur
(may actually vary depending on precision)
we have shown that the induced field doesn't need to rotate
But the rolling ball gives us a vectorable momentum we can use to assist
in a beneficial angular displacement away from the field.


And we have seen that the induced field is the same as having 2 adjacent magnets
(or the two-force made from the cheap Chinese knockoffs)
and the same as the HJ gate.
and we can build a SMT using a spherical magnet just the same


we can widen the rotor and narrow the track distance
and the SMT is the same inside out
with the stator magnets on an inner track
and the rotor magnet-ends outside the track
and we have the same situation


We can also place the ball on a cart, or I don't know... maybe a toy fire truck??
and the wheels will perform a similar benefit to what the rolling ball does for us


Or on a wheel that spins
but the wheel that spins has a pi issue
unless the wheel is huge or magnets tiny


So we have a few options with a smot,
We can have a car go around a track
Or a ball go around a track


We can go uphill and roll back down to the beginning
or continue on to another track, then another
until we get back to the first


Or we can use the momentum of the ball to activate a mechanism
that moves it to the beginning


there's nothing secret about the number 9,
We could just as simply have a loop of 2, or a loop of 49


But in general, the more field interactions you have to work through
the more problems you will encounter.
you must avoid field symmetry in the loop
or you lose the function.

[blueplanet]

This is your intellectual property, not theirs.
If you don't protect it, i fear that it would be treated as a scam rather than as intellectual property.

I also prefer to call it the SMT.


yes I "should" just do that, but then it would just be you me and my cheeseburger


....

[sm0ky2]

It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn't invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It's a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.

James Maxwell
Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson
Ken Wheeler

It's all the same thing
Science does not provide an understanding of magnetism
Maxwell did, but no one understands it, even Einstein needed
help.


There may only be one person alive right now that fully gets it
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small