user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

[hartiberlin]

Hi All,
I had a longer email conversation yeasterday night with Marco ( user Turbo)
and he revealed the following things to me:



>Hi Marco, will you soon publish, how you
>have lighted the 60 Watts bulb
>with the 9 Volts battery and the
>one wire solution ?
>
>Thanks, Regards, Stefan.


Marco answered:

well it has to wait because we are running close onto the tpu, this goes first.
there isn't much overunity onto that it's more of transferring power.
marco

when i suceed in making the tpu work im going to make a big video with the
cam of my dad and show how exactly to do it from a roll wire and parts to a working thing.
marco

we got size and frequencys , so i was again hit by the tpu virus to give it one more try.
that 9 volt ring was not over unity , i never said it was.
its a ring in a strong field ,like i said direct induction.
so i was transferring power from one point to another.
this is not my goal but i decided to post the clip because the forum
went a bit "dead" to get things going again, and it certainly did.

so sorry if you got the wrong impression.
hopefully soon we all can start to build the real thing.

marco


in both cases the power came of a 800 Ah battery source.

just my way of showing im not giving up and sharing results.....which i know now is not always appreciated.

anyway ,for me its good to see the folks wrapping coils.

the more on the job the faster it goes right?

the second case was also not overunity ,however i truly believe when this is tuned properly to nature sources it can put out overunity.

these were all verry intresting experiments, sometimes dangerous, i still feel there is more to be discoverd.

but main goal is to do the tpu.

so i will continue that one first.

most of the people only want a working overunity design which they can cheaply rebuild and use.

the moment you say transmitter or source everybody starts to yell and call words.

i certainly learnd a lot about human nature.

you are free to post whatever you want to.

marco



hartiberlin wrote:
>marco1977 wrote:
>>in both cases the power came of a 800 Ah source.
>>
>
>Do you mean a 12 Volt battery with 800 Ah capacity ?
>
>What power level did it put out into the transmitter ? ( Volts x amps)
>
>
>
>>just my way of showing im not giving up and sharing results.....which i know now is not always appreciated.
>>
>
>
>Okay, that is very much appreciated.
>Many thanks for clearing this up.
>
>Yes, it might have helped to
>get a few more people to do experiments
>like me !

yes, you see i worked in a garage and one day there was one new huge battery left over.

the guy that runs the company had computer problems so i fixed it.

he gave me this battery, i filled it up with very much acid, charged it and it's very usefull in my experiments.

marco




well , dave just wanted to show how easy it could be faked, hes a really good guy and hes working the clock round on the tpu again.

his reacerch is very very serious.

marco


hartiberlin wrote:
>And what about
> Dave?s videos lighting the bulb ?
>
>Was this just a cheap fake or how did
>he do it ?
>
>Hmm, I thought he was very serious with his
>research...?


well , dave just wanted to show how easy it could be faked, he is a really good guy and he is working the clock round on the tpu again.

his research is very very serious.

marco

[aether22]

But did he?

Dave didn't say he faked it anywhere that I can see, maybe he meant people to read between in his statements that 'He never claimed it was OU' but I didn't read that as 'I faked it'.

Dave, can you please clarify, I am only casually interested in the TPU, if you verify that you really have had significant energy induction into the 90 degree coil I'll be replicating your work, but if I'm replicating something that hasn't yet worked at all that's not fair.

My interpretation is that Dave simply has a sporadic FE effect he can't reliably induce so he says that it isn't Free Energy, and for all I know he might have got out less energy than he pumped into his coils.

Here are the other I want him to answer:

2: Can you verify that if it isn't faked that it is then putting out energy at least momentarily without any continued input, so it's just a collection of coils?
3: How difficult do you find it to be to get induction into the collector coils with the 3 frequencies being input? Is this effect pretty reliable and can it be found with anything other than the 3 freq.s you put in your pdf?
4: Are you sure that the collector isn't being induced as a one or t turn coil? While the collector is substantially at 90 degrees to the other coils unless you wound the coils back over themselves, or unless the collector is folded back on it's self (2 bucking bifilars in series) there single turn induction should exist, and while I'd expect it to be small it should still be there.
5: To what extent (if at all) does a single collector with 3 control coils over it work (as opposed to 3 of these stacked), does the collector show induction? Does it work unpowered even sometimes?
6: Do you find any gyroscopic type effects or any other resistance to motion effects as exhibited by the SM device? (You'll make my day if it's a yes)
7: Does it get (too) hot?
8: Does it output (pulsed) DC and does the freq. match that of a TPU.
9: Would a normal Oscope, without digital storage be of much use or are the waveforms too irregular?
10: Is the collector coil wrapped around the whole shebang used for anything other that scope measurments?

Incidentally I don't care if it's Free Energy, I'm happy with any true anomoly such as induction of energy into a 90 degree coil, impossible transmission of energy, gyroscopic forces.

I do think that those complaining that a device may have energy input are stupid, the domain is www.overunity.com

[Groundloop]

[EDIT] Deleted.

[Grumpy]

Also you might want to think about a static magnetic field for the coils

What, but then the field can't relax - you can't be serious?!?  Ha Ha!

[NerzhDishual]

Hi crafty Over_Unity_dot_com chaps

A bit off topic and definitely late!

@allcanadian

Basically the tranformers and LED's in the stereo are powered 24-7... Major  energy loss when no work is being done. A good counter example is the crystal  radio it requires no power even when doing work, you can use a linear amplifier that has minor power loss to hear it loud, but this method of reciever is no longer employed or developed because engineers get a slight inprovement in quality or use and are willing to accept major power losses to get these minor gains in user enjoyment. Rarely these days do any electronic devices get built to be energy savers, and the devices you do see labeled as power savers are still consuming power when not in use.

Thanks for your kind answer. I have just read it. I see what you meant: your remark was about the stupid design of actual electronic devices (NRG consumption-wise).

I was (paranoidaly) thinking of any hidden overunity behavior which could have been detected (in some 'reactive' electronic devices) by a mere "Watt Electric Power sage Monitor".

BTW1 : It is not so stupid electricity-compagnies-turnover-wise )

BTW2: A friend of mine made the following observations :
Sounds like that (in France) the resistance of all the cores of the new spark plugs were about 5000 ohms. The core resistance of the old ones were zero. Actually, I have cheked some of this : I have found some spaks plugs with 0 ohm and some with 5000 ohms.
I have read on the web that this (internal SP) resistance is used for avoiding RF interferences. The problem is that the Ignition Leads have also their own resistance for the same purpose. Why?

According to him after some experiments this provides an extra fuel consumption...
Am I missing something? 
Perhaps could you test your spark plugs and your ignition leads resistances!
Best