12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ARMCORTEX]

Thx you for your spiritual support, lets hope I do rejoice.

[ltseung888]

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98aiISB2DNw


The claim was generating 2340 watts with 750 watt input. The "Chas Campbell" device used wheels, belts, flywheels and gears. It made much noise. That indicated some "unbalance" or "pulsing" somewhere. The most probable place was the belts that were sometimes tight and sometimes loose.


Such a pulsing set up might lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy as most of the wheels were mounted vertically.  (I am guessing as I do not have the device to examine.)


The Peru Energy Multiplier used Pulsed Friction as Input.  The unbalanced wheel was very evident.  The Chas Campbell used "Pulsed Belt?"  The noise indicated "unbalance"?


Let some competent scientists analyze the Chas Campbell device after the "XXX Wheel" spins continuously for 2 weeks.  Who will be XXX???

[ltseung888]

Met Mr. Tong Po Chi this afternoon.  Tong built the Tong Wheel that was a simulation of a slice of the 225 HP Pulse Motor.

We discussed the old times and the latest development of the XXX Wheel.  Tong felt that it was well within his engineering capability.  However, he is busy with his other committed projects.  He said that he might do it when he became less busy.  If someone else does it in Hong Kong, he does not mind visiting and provide improvement suggestions.

I talked about adding an unbalanced wheel to the orginal Tong Wheel.  Apparently, the original Tong wheel passed many hands who took it apart and made changes.  The wooden structure fell apart.  It should be retired. 

The new effort is to provide a small pulse power to an unbalanced wheel to maintain its rotation; bring-in the maximum gravitational and/or electromagnetic energy and use that bring-in energy.

We now know that the bring-in gravitational energy can be independent of the Pulse Energy.  The design is likely to be very different.

[ARMCORTEX]

Chas Campbell was no mathematician or physician.

From reading back an old thread from Ashtweth, ratio was not critical.

He tinkered his way to it, by the strenght of his idea, it worked.

My analysis is valid, I am not scientist.

See the video, see my analysis, judge for yourself, by the law of possibility, and common sense, true working is not far from that.

Btw, i changed my file hosting to mediafire, what a bunmch of crap, my other wasnt even working

See other youtube channel, from turkey, they incorporate other methods.

youtube is linked in my description.

[ltseung888]

 Let me do some simple calculation to see how much gravitational energy we can reasonably extract with a simple bicycle unbalanced wheel.

The assumptions are:
1.    The Input energy required is to keep the unbalanced wheel rotating at a certain speed.  That amount is used to overcome friction and wind resistance.
2.    The lead-out energy is independent of the Input energy.  It can be estimated from the potential energy gained by the weight W1 (mgh)
3.    Assume m = 3 Kg; g = 9.8m/s/s; h = 3 cm (such assumptions are possible from the Raymond Head video).
4.    The possible bring-in energy per revolution is 3 x 9.8 x 0.03 = 0.882 Newton-Meters.
5.    Assume that we have one revolution per second – not a very high speed.  The Power available = 0.882 Newton-Meters per second or 0.882 watts.  That is equal to 0.0012 HP.

Let us not be too greedy at the first attempt.  This 0.882 watts should be able to sustain Input 1.  The self-looped Bessler style unbalanced bicycle wheel running forever is possible with good modern engineering.  If Bessler could do it 3 centuries ago, we should be able to do it now.  Do not expect the first XXX wheel to power your house or even light a 100w light bulb.

*** Chas Campbell started his rotation at 1430rpm - almost 24 times the 60rpm in this example.  The Bedini motors also run at high rpms.  I believe the Bessler Wheel ran at low rpm - technology in the 17th Century.