Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Started by hartiberlin, November 30, 2006, 06:11:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Dingus Mungus

Compare the energy in the pendulums... Plus I took some kinetic energy and burned it with a damper. Clearly another violation.

iacob alex

          Hi!
     A new year and some fresh news about  the latest developments of Prof  Milkovic at     http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/AktuelnoEng.html 
       All the Bests! / Alex
 

mindsweeper

Hi everyone using Overunity.com

As this is my 1st post I thought I?d just say I know very little about OU, I came here while searching the net for Josef Papp. Found the posting on Mikovic and the buzz discussion, I was inspired.

I got to work with Wm2D and think that a good way to prove unity (+)? is use a flywheel to swing the pendulum?.

I?m using a 15Kg pendulum, 16Kg lever, 18,78Kg weight, 9Kg flywheel.

Could we not at least prove unity this way?

I?ve not managed to get more that 12 rotations of the flywheel but it seems that fine tuning the green weight on the lever can induce radical swing effects in the pendulum, causing it to speed up and then go out of sync for a few rotations then back in sync.

How hard would it be to get the flywheel rotations correct (resonant?) to induce a steady swing effect on the pendulum?

Should I just give up now?

FreeEnergy

Quote from: mindsweeper on January 18, 2007, 01:13:53 PM
Hi everyone using Overunity.com

As this is my 1st post I thought I?d just say I know very little about OU, I came here while searching the net for Josef Papp. Found the posting on Mikovic and the buzz discussion, I was inspired.

I got to work with Wm2D and think that a good way to prove unity (+)? is use a flywheel to swing the pendulum?.

I?m using a 15Kg pendulum, 16Kg lever, 18,78Kg weight, 9Kg flywheel.

Could we not at least prove unity this way?

I?ve not managed to get more that 12 rotations of the flywheel but it seems that fine tuning the green weight on the lever can induce radical swing effects in the pendulum, causing it to speed up and then go out of sync for a few rotations then back in sync.

How hard would it be to get the flywheel rotations correct (resonant?) to induce a steady swing effect on the pendulum?

Should I just give up now?

could you try and make it a one-way flywheel? i think that might make it better.

mindsweeper

Quote from: FreeEnergy on January 18, 2007, 03:11:13 PM

could you try and make it a one-way flywheel? i think that might make it better.

OK but how would you measure the force needed to move the pendulum to start position and then measure the total force the flywheel takes from one release.

I know I can't get it going perpetually,

But, I'm not sure how to workout the correct start position so the most force from the initial pendulum release is absorbed by the flywheel. Is it quite difficult?