12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[ltseung888]

Dear Lawrence,

I happen to have a one wheel bike. I turned the right side crank 180 degrees, so both point in the same direction. Then I removed the pedals and attached a small iron weight to it. So I now have a one wheel bike (it also has a saddle of course) from which I can turn the wheel by hand. Or by rocking the bike forwards and backwards. I can get it to spin very fast that way. As soon as I stop rocking (speeding) the bike is difficult to hold with my hands, and depending on how I hold it, it may start thumping with the saddle on the ground. It looks like I am adding energy to the spinning wheel by rocking it forth and back, and I can let some of the energy get back out in another direction. I think the rotational speed will get less if energy is used to lift up the bike, thumping on the floor.

It is possibly half of an example. I assume I will need to attach the bike to something else, to use some of the energy (and to perhaps rotate the wheel by motor so we can control the speed).

I am not an engineer, and use all kind of spare parts I have or can find. I have some more bike wheels, even one with a dynamo in the hub, but I am bad in connecting all of this together. Most of the time my constructions will be to weak to support all that rocking energy. I am better of with electronics.

Please recommend how to proceed.

My recommendation is to read reply 2957 again. If you are not good with construction, just wait.  One or more QMOGENs is likely to come as a product from China or India.

[Paul-R]

....and have spent millions of dollars perfecting an efficient, balanced and dependable motor.  If we were to do as you suggest, our motors would not only be less efficient, but their life span would be greatly decreased....

This is for regular motor usage, vacuum cleaners, egg whisks and so on.

The whole point of this part of Lawrence's work is that the system MUST have an unbalanced element in it. Not necessarily the motor itself, but another element in the chain.

Whether Lawrence's work functions is quite another matter.

[MarkE]

This is for regular motor usage, vacuum cleaners, egg whisks and so on.

The whole point of this part of Lawrence's work is that the system MUST have an unbalanced element in it. Not necessarily the motor itself, but another element in the chain.

Whether Lawrence's work functions is quite another matter.

Despite his protestations, Lawrence has never shown a surplus of output energy over input from any of his schemes.  He routinely promotes claims of overunity for devices that have no useful output at all, claiming that they have a capacity to do work, all the while neglecting that any work that they would perform would result in associated extra demand on the input.  Additionally, Lawrence has never shown any reason to believe that unbalancing a wheel will do anything to improve efficiency, extract energy from the environment somehow, or otherwise offer some hope of advantage over a balanced wheel.

[MarkE]

My recommendation is to read reply 2957 again. If you are not good with construction, just wait.  One or more QMOGENs is likely to come as a product from China or India.

The likelihood is more than  10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000:1 that no working QMOGEN will ever come from anywhere.

[ltseung888]

Improvement on the parts list in reply 2960

a.  Use an unbalanced flywheel as shown.  Start with a 15 cm diameter 5Kg Flywheel.  Unbalanced weight of 0.5 Kg adjustable distance from center from 8 cm to 15 cm.  Need to contact a machine shop.  This part must be very secure.  May enclose the whole set up in a "cage" for safety reasons.

b.  Use motor and generator from the same manufacturer.  Wait and see which manufacturer responses.

The top QMOGEN from Sterling Allan is the Russian MES50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Es9JUwU7HQ

I still prefer the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.  The Unbalanced Cylinders can improve almost any QMOGEN.