12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[Dingus Mungus]

Ahhh my bad, I was confused...

I had assumed you had united the theories of gravity and electromagnetism!
You see physicists have united electricity and magnetism by proving they were
the same force and phenomenom just observed differently. Then they ran in to
a snag... No one yet has been able to unite electromagnetism and gravity with
a single equation yet. So they are still considered two different kinds of force.
So unfortunately "electro-gravity" is probably a bad term to use until someone
finally figures out the whole unified theory thing first...

~Dingus

[aleks]

As soon as you apply any load at all, the excess energy is converted,
and the secondary arm begins runs at less than half the input wattage.
(50N spring VRS. 0.1N damper)

So this sim still proves my initial point...
Untill you start removing energy, putting it in is missleading.

But how can you be sure it is exactly a damper spring? It could be a stiff attraction spring that does not oscillate. Hence my question about free oscillations. If these are free oscillations then it is nothing special, at all, and the output graph can't be called 'power out'.

Beside that there is NO indication of pendulum's swing - while it should also 'oscillate' like the output graph. So, output graph may not be tied to swing, at all - it may be exactly the consumed power.

Comment from xnonix could be useful.

[aleks]

I had assumed you had united the theories of gravity and electromagnetism!

I wonder - if dielectric body carrying surface charge does start to move and accelerate in electromagnetic field, can this be construed to be equal to gravity? Can it be true that physicists are unable to equate electromagnetism to gravity just because they were unable to create electromagnetic system as powerful as the Earth core itself: i.e. because it is non-reproducible, and not because it is nonsense?

[xnonix]

Hi all,
after many studies in wm2d my conclusions are in this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2138.40.html

This thread is based on this device optimized for a circular movement.

[aleks]

Hi all,
after many studies in wm2d my conclusions are in this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2138.40.html

This thread is based on this device optimized for a circular movement.

I'm unable to follow your conclusions. Could you say your conclusions on the model you have posted on this Milkovic thread?

But what is more important - what kind of spring have you used? (wm2d is a bit expensive for me to try it myself)