Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Started by hartiberlin, November 30, 2006, 06:11:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scorpile

This is interesting, because asuming that bedini design gives you a 99.99% eficient motor, and assuming this system really works, at least .01% , adding more charge to the other side of the system could maybe allow you to run on capacitors.

FreeEnergy

i don't know much about bedini but try it out and see. i have a good feeling about this! but it has to be Milkovic style. just go back and see my last attached image.

Scorpile

I have seen a lot of physics errors when modeling those aparatus like the discused in this thread.

I don't know others, but i have the theory that those errors probably are because the software detects the overunity and show it as an error because that will be ripping some of the "well known" laws.

What i want to set clear for everyone, is that in my case, i am seeking a way to "gain" more energy than the energy i spent generating it, but without ripping any thermodinamics, or physic law.  I think we can do some tricks to "extract" that exceding energy free and contained on it own "battery".  Think this like when a bomb explodes, because you use less energy to start the bomb, than the energy the bomb releases when it explodes, no matter if the energy was contained on chemicals, i know we are not creating energy...  That's not what i seek.

nightlife

Adding a weight to a bedini wheels design does not make a difference so scratch that idea.

I did how ever find a very interesting thing about the bedini design that I think most have over looked. I will test my new design and let you all know the results after I am done.

aleks

The huge problem with gravity-based devices is that kinetic energy's direction cannot be reversed. So, if a body have gained a velocity due to gravity pull, whatever you do - rotate it, skew, dissect, etc - it will still be falling into the same direction. Pendulum is a way to "redirect" kinetic energy, but it is redirected at the expense of pendulum's arm stretching on atomic level. You really have to create an "inertia shield" first (if that one exists at all) before gravity pull can be used as an energy source (but then the "inertia shield" should be efficient enough so that gain is higher than expense).