12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[exnihiloest]

...
The complete paper can be read on the next link (PDF - 122KB):
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Theory_of_Gravity_Machines.pdf

Marjanovic is far from being a credible author. He makes beginner's mistakes in physics.
See:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1763.msg244606#msg244606

[andrea]

Marjanovic is far from being a credible author. He makes beginner's mistakes in physics.
See:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1763.msg244606#msg244606

Hello, did you read this paper yet? http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Theory_of_Gravity_Machines.pdf
I've read it carefully. I've found no mistakes, rather I think this finally gives a sense to this system, two stage oscillator.

[Omnibus]

@andrea,

Hello, did you read this paper yet? http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Theory_of_Gravity_Machines.pdf
I've read it carefully. I've found no mistakes, rather I think this finally gives a sense to this system, two stage oscillator.

Like I said in a previous post regarding the quoted text, he may have a point but it isn't coming across. It isn't at all clear how his analysis leads to OU. Maybe he can come to this board and explain it more thoroughly, as I suggested earlier.

[Cloxxki]

I'll try to break it up.

* 2-stage oscillator is presented, claimed to be OU
* papers are presented, supposedly explaining the math towards OU
* no design that offered, even on paper, any OU, is yet to be presented.

I am no engineer by trade, but can be rather clever if I set my mind to it. A few patent apps and grants support this.
If someone can explain to me a math that shows OU, I can design an apparatus to exploit it, to great efficiency.
I came to these forums to find such math, which I am incapable of coming up with myself.

All seems to point to the math just not working at all, else Milkovic' devices would be powering themselves. No-one is so incompetent to find out new math, and not be able to exploit it.

[Omnibus]

The math may be OK and it may prove the device is OU but that's not a guarantee that making it self-sustaining would be an easy engineering task. Friction losses, for instance, may pose insurmountable difficulties. Engineering of such devices is a daunting task. Not that it hasn't occurred in the past (and has been suppressed) but it isn't at all as easy as it seems even if the math proves the machine is OU.