12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[noonespecial]

Are any of you in a position to do the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier with Unbalanced Cylinders in reply 2546?  The story was that an eighty year old inventor put one of these devices in a factory and saved 90% electricity bills.  The local electricity company accused him of stealing electricity.  He found Tsinghua University to be the "judge".  Tsinghua found him innocent. 

The technology became an "unexplained state secret" until Lee and Tseung proposed the lead-out energy theory.

The lead-out energy theory predicts that the Milkovic 2SO, Chan Wheel, William Skinner Device, Bessler Wheel, Peru and Chas Campbell Devices are all theoretically sound.  The Unbalanced Cylinder is likely to be superior as it is many unbalanced wheels bundled together.

Who will reproduce this "unexplained Chinese State Secret" and benefit the World?

If leading-out gravitational energy is possible, how about magnetic and electromagnetic???

I like the design. Do you know if the individual cylinders are linked to each other with some type of timing? You show a belt but I'm wondering if a chain was actually employed. Do you know?

Thanks.

[ARMCORTEX]

How is this concept more proven than Chas Campbell and flywheel systems.

Wich were widely demonstrated in a multitude of videos

Lets us reconsider and ponder on thhese.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr67j71NSsQ&list=PLvAzms-COt4ZkheBJZ24-p2O8rPef1DHK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm1UK-5-AD4

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=UCUZA+ENERJ%C4%B0

[ltseung888]

I like the design. Do you know if the individual cylinders are linked to each other with some type of timing? You show a belt but I'm wondering if a chain was actually employed. Do you know?

Thanks.

At that time (2006), we were told the story.  We then saw a video with massive cylinders.  I believe there were 3 cylinders but I was not sure how they were linked to each other.

Once we explained the possible workings using the Lee-Tseung lead-out theory, we were interrupted.  (The US team who developed the 225 HP Pulse Motor were there.)

At that time, I did not know whether the cylinders were balanced or unbalanced.  But the top brains at Tsinghua University could easily figure that out.  They had access to the device and was able to replicate it...

Am I disclosing "Chinese State Secrets"?  I am lucky to be in Hong Kong.

This reminds me that I forgot to mention Mr. Wang Shen He.  He was with us at Tsinghua University and he had an "all magnetic motor coupled with shielding and fluid rotation".  He was made a millionaire.  The joke in Hong Kong was - US poisoned their scientists.  China made them millionaires and kept them quiet.

[ltseung888]

How is this concept more proven than Chas Campbell and flywheel systems.

Wich were widely demonstrated in a multitude of videos

Lets us reconsider and ponder on thhese.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr67j71NSsQ&list=PLvAzms-COt4ZkheBJZ24-p2O8rPef1DHK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm1UK-5-AD4

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=UCUZA+ENERJ%C4%B0

I am specifically interested in the second video from the first link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pwv_hos3qyI&index=2&list=PLvAzms-COt4ZkheBJZ24-p2O8rPef1DHK

MOTOR-GENERATOR «YMNEE»

This may be a simple alternative to WITTS.

Good job.  Now, how do we get more information?  Are they willing to "give" this technology to the World???

Do we have enough technical knowledge to "build" it?

The unbalanced cylinder is essentially a super-set of flywheels and pendulums.  It can store energy as well as lead-out gravitational energy.  It should be more efficient than the Peru or Chas Campbell devices.  (The Chan Wheel is superior to the Milkovic 2SO.)

The Chas Campbell devices did not get the proper scientific recognition because of the "road block of violating the Law of Conservation of Energy".  Hopefully, the road block is now removed.

@ARMCORTEX, I shall read more of your posts and videos.  Thank you for the good work you have produced. 

[norman6538]

Here is the Chan wheel clincher test...

I propose the following simple chan wheel test.
See the attached photo which has the following
1. a wheel on the right with a washer weight at the top
2. a string attached to that wheel than can input power
   to pull the wheel off of the noon position where it will rotate
3. 3 washers on that string down on the right with a cardboard
stop underneath so that we only power the wheel from noon
to 2 oclock and the washers stop pulling but the wheel continues to rotate
4. a pivot in the middle
5. enough weight on the left to balance the wheel on the right - see the large washers
6. a little extra weight on the left to be lifted by the chan wheel "yank down" force.

the input work calculation from 3 above = weight x distance
and the output work calculation is from 6 above  = weight x distance.

I suggest that the work in be enough to get the wheel to rotate once fully
back up to noon and then you will get two chan wheel "yank down" forces
to measure.

If the chan wheel can pass this simple OU test by numerous testers then we have a
winner. If not then the keyboarders win.

My test results had very poor results. I don't think my washer has enough mass to
get it rotating fast enough. I will do more tests before I post them.

Norman