12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[PIH123]

1.  The Milkovic 2SO uses centrifugal force to lift the Weight is a fact.
2.  The Chan Wheel with a properly unbalanced wheel is superior to the pendulum is a fact.
3.  The Tsinghua University Unbalanced Cylinder is a super set of Unbalanced Wheels is a fact.
4.  The Skinner device using centrifugal force to lead-out gravitational energy is a fact.
5.  If gravitational energy can be lead-out, magnetic and electromagnetic energy will be lead-out in a similar way is a fact.
6.  The sling (King David) used centrifugal force is a fact.
7.  The Forever Yuen experiments in swinging up, down, left and right on youtube using Centrifugal force is a fact.
8.  The meetings with Liang, Wang, 225HP groups at Tsinghua University is a fact.
9.  Centrifugal force varies as the square of the angular velocity is a fact.
10. QMOGENs use motor to increase the angular or rotational velocity is a fact.

The Physics cannot be wrong. The secondary school students who went to Taipo to see the Chan Wheel can follow it.  The Nay Sayers cannot follow it (or paid to act stupid) ...

Then I guess since I can easily follow the physics of what you are trying to portray as fact, I must be the other one.
Some dumb paid shill awaiting my check from XYZ petroleum corp.

Sorry, but that is just lame Larry.

Do you really not have a problem offering number 5 as fact

"5.  If gravitational energy can be lead-out, magnetic and electromagnetic energy will be lead-out in a similar way is a fact."

"Ifs" and "will be"s represent facts to you.

That is not just word semantics, it is blatantly made up.
Anyone reading this post (even your supporters) will have a hard time supporting that.


Maybe you are not such a good guy if you try to pass off something so obviously untrue as a fact.

Good Luck

Pete

[ltseung888]

Conversation with a teacher who is also a sailor.

Teacher: "We can sail with the wind blowing behind.  We can also sail into the wind with some zigzag path.  Can you use gravitational energy to do something similar?"

What is your answer?

Lawrence Tseung
see reply 3038

[ltseung888]

Do you really not have a problem offering number 5 as fact

5.  If gravitational energy can be lead-out, magnetic and electromagnetic energy will be lead-out in a similar way is a fact.

Pete

Pete,

You missed the magnetic horizontal pendulum experiment.

[PIH123]

Conversation with a teacher who is also a sailor.

Teacher: "We can sail with the wind blowing behind.  We can also sail into the wind with some zigzag path.  Can you use gravitational energy to do something similar?"

What is your answer?

Lawrence Tseung
see reply 3038

The way a sail produces "lift" can be easily explained by conventional physics.
Bernoulli and/or Newtonian principles specifically.

But this "lift' alone cannot produce forward motion. You also need to understand what is under the boat resisting the urge for sideways slip.

A combination of fixed mast point (leading edge), a curved/cambered sail and keel/centreboard are all part of the equation.

To simply point out that "we can sail into the wind" as if that is some kind of unexpected thing, highlights the fact that your "teacher" who is also a sailor, merely understands how to helm a sail boat, and not how the sail works.
And he is probably a "music therapy" or "dance" teacher judging by the last part of his question.

It always amuses me (as an aerospace engineer and an occasional sailor BTW), when someone quotes a pilot as some kind of authority on how any component of a plane works. Are taxi drivers experts on the IC engine because they steer the cab?


The bottom line is that any system relying on gravitational energy to produce an unexpected result, will not work because the critical component of being able to vector the force in a desired direction (that which the keel of the boat does) simply does not and physically cannot exist.

[ltseung888]

The way a sail produces "lift" can be easily explained by conventional physics.
Bernoulli and/or Newtonian principles specifically.

But this "lift' alone cannot produce forward motion. You also need to understand what is under the boat resisting the urge for sideways slip.

A combination of fixed mast point (leading edge), a curved/cambered sail and keel/centreboard are all part of the equation.

To simply point out that "we can sail into the wind" as if that is some kind of unexpected thing, highlights the fact that your "teacher" who is also a sailor, merely understands how to helm a sail boat, and not how the sail works.
And he is probably a "music therapy" or "dance" teacher judging by the last part of his question.

It always amuses me (as an aerospace engineer and an occasional sailor BTW), when someone quotes a pilot as some kind of authority on how any component of a plane works. Are taxi drivers experts on the IC engine because they steer the cab?


The bottom line is that any system relying on gravitational energy to produce an unexpected result, will not work because the critical component of being able to vector the force in a desired direction (that which the keel of the boat does) simply does not and physically cannot exist.

4 boards as shown in 3065 (not 3035) will do it...  Thanks for the vectoring of forces.  You are a real engineer...