12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[MarkE]

Actually, you are partially right! - All we need for a fuller understanding of all this is clearly shown on YT - just search for "solid mass centrifugal propulsion'' presented by the 'ISA'! - it shows in vivid animation just how the mechanical scheme fits together - and from this we can simplify and make adaptations. In short, it IS related to King David's sling etc but it will be seen that there must be PAIRS of weighted wheels working in harmony, NOT just one, and by weighted wheels, is meant wheels that appear symmetric, but are weighted eccentrically! ...

The glaring fallacy in all of this is that instead of just requiring forward thrust, this scheme requires both forward thrust and a source of centripetal acceleration.  So, it in no way removes the requirement for forward thrust.

[Paul-R]

This is like the cartoon where Bugs Bunny uses an electric fan on a boat facing a sheet of canvass and the boat, and the fan moved across the ocean.

Bugs bunny reminds me of Tom and Jerry - the (irrelevant) episode when Jerry throws Tom across the room somehow. Tom hits a cheese grater, is  grated, and is reconstituted the other side of  the grater.

[ltseung888]

http://www.international-space-agency.us/cps.html


Director

Mr. Rick R. Dobson, Jr.(Veteran U.S Navy)

Centrifugal Propulsion System "Closed Loop Propulsion" Program Office (CPS-PO)

ISA Email : rick.dobson@international-space-agency.us

Phone: +(402) 299-2799

Solid Mass Centrifugal Propulsion System (SM-CPS) has been a project underdevelopment in secret for 27 years, and just went public January of this year, 2013. This revolutionary propulsion system uses heavy mass stored in a centrifugal field, and manipulated in a calibrated and synchronized out of balance state to convert rotary energy in centrifugal "gyroscopic" field and converts it to linier energy "thrust". This closed loop mass system is revolutionary in that it does not need to interact/manipulate with exterior mass "water/air/gases" like propellers, turbines, and rocket nozzles, and can operate in marine, land, air, and space environments seamlessly. As long as the electric motors of the SM-CPS are provided with power, the Propulsion System will produce thrust. The system was specially designed for manned space operations, and as a replacement for chemical rocket technologies that are very limited in that once the liquid fuel "mass" of such spacecraft is expended out the rocket engine nozzle, the rocket motor is useless and rendered inoperable. NERVA "Nuclear Rockets", Ion, and electric propulsion systems are also open loop propulsion systems, in that they deplete their reaction mass as they operate.


The International Space Agency Solid Mass Centrifugal Propulsion System is revolutionary in that reaction mass is not depleted as the propulsion system generates thrust, and is a historic first in Propulsion Technology. This revolutionary propulsion system can produce constant thrust as long as power is provided to the electric motors of the system. Utilizing Fission or Fusion power plants in a space operations theater, the vehicles would have the use of 1G "or Greater" constant acceleration / deceleration capability for 5 to 7 years of more, before reactor refueling would be required. This makes the SM-CPS an excellent choice for Earth/Moon, Earth/Mars, and Solar System manned spacecraft programs.

*** USA is definitely working on Flying Saucer Technology and has achieved some success.  China has many UFO sightings - even in Hong Kong.  The King David Sling technology is not all that difficult to visualize.

*** Tsinghua University has the QMOGEN technology since 1996.  Any top engineer can put the two together. Lead-out energy Flying Saucer is a certainty.  When will such top secret development be turned to civilian use to benefit the World???

Thanks to Mr. XYZ in bringing this up.

Lawrence
reply 3156

[Mr XYZ]

The glaring fallacy in all of this is that instead of just requiring forward thrust, this scheme requires both forward thrust and a source of centripetal acceleration.  So, it in no way removes the requirement for forward thrust.

"Glaring fallacy" ? Really? - The how is it that this revelation has produced such fierce opposition since it was published? - Here is a quote from a guy who was associated with Mr. Rick R. Dobson - "I personally know Rick and he has disappeared.  His house was firebombed because of vids like this and he went to the wilderness" ! - Hmm, so if it was so fallacious and unworthy of serious attention, then why such heavy opposition from the power-brokers? ... Worth considering!

[Pirate88179]

                 "Glaring fallacy" ? Really? - The how is it that this revelation has produced such fierce opposition since it was published? - Here is a quote from a guy who was associated with Mr. Rick R. Dobson - "I personally know Rick and he has disappeared.  His house was firebombed because of vids like this and he went to the wilderness" ! - Hmm, so if it was so fallacious and unworthy of serious attention, then why such heavy opposition from the power-brokers? ... Worth considering!

Maybe he left because he could not back up his claims?  We have seen this many times before.  so.....

Bill