12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[eugene-g]

What if instead of pendulum we could use something like this picture in the attachment to keep the system "out of balance"

[allcanadian]

@eugene-g
The problem with your setup is friction, friction reduces motion, motion is produced by force---so there must be an equal force wanting to keep something in motion.

[astroshima]

There have been many replications of Milkovic's system. NONE have shown OU!

Hans von Lieven

Dear Ser Lieven and others,
please give me any or as much references to above claim!
Any link?
I am looking for exact measurements (of input and output work) with videos or photographs!

PS: I have read this thread from page 36 to 44...

I have also made ?Two-stage Mechanical Oscillator? someway (but not exactly) similar to Milkovic's, to test his "12 times overunity" claims, but my measurements in one very limited scenario, that I was able to measure, showed coefficient of efficiency equals to 0.9! That's far below 12!

But I was unable to do all tests or to construct the device by the best way... I will post new post...

[astroshima]

I have also made ?Two-stage Mechanical Oscillator? someway (but not exactly) similar to Milkovic's, to test his "12 times overunity" claims, but my measurements in one very limited scenario, that I was able to measure, showed coefficient of efficiency equals to 0.9! That's far below 12!

But I was unable to do all tests or to construct the device by the best way...

I am an amateur (Java programmer) and I do not do or construct mechanical devices...
I have past one exam in Theoretical Mechanics on college so my knowledge of physics is limited. But Physics was my hobby during elementary and high school.

I have used my bicycle to replicate ?Two-stage Mechanical Oscillator?.
Pedals were balance beam. One pedal had pendulum made of wood and bob and other pedal had a larger (and heavier) bob (to simulate longer and heavier end of balance beam with hammer-head)...PS: The "problem" with this construction is that the both ends of balance beam are the same length...

I have made just one scenario (measurement) test by filing the system with energy JUST ONCE at the beginning.

System was fed with energy by lifting the pendulum just once so I have measured input work: A = m*g*h.
My premise was that output work is equal to mechanical-heat energy made by impact of the large bob at the other side of balance beam.
And that output (mechanical-heat energy) is equal to Sum of potential (E=m*g*h) energies  of the large bob. To mesure that sum I had to count the number of oscillations of large bob and quickly to read its achieved heights on the ruler fixed behind such "oscillator".
I have repeated the same scenario (measurement) test for about 10 times and used average measurements.

So I had coefficient of efficiency equals to 0.54 (54%)in this particular test with this particular device.
I made theoretical approximation for constant oscillation mode, based on previous test, of maximum coefficient of efficiency with my model, and it was 0.9 (90%)

I think I have also noticed things about energy transmissions like Mr. Hans von Lieven speaks about but I didn't put much attention, tests or thought about it...I did this tests more than 5 years ago...(PS: at Dec. 17. 2002.)

[astroshima]

Did anybody constructed and measured coefficient of efficiency (input and output work) of Milkovic's ?Two-stage Mechanical Oscillator??

Can anybody do that please?
Many people wasting huge time on Mr Milkovic's overunity claims ...

I believe that input work of force impulses (dE = A = m*g*dh) is easy to measure with camera, and ruler... and to read it from video clip.
And output work can be measured with dynamo lamp(s) and oscilloscope...or some other way...