Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated

[d3x0r]

The relay noise may not match the video?  The video is 30fps; every frame has 2 LEDs on; which is 2 switches (one off, and a new one on )  3 cycles of 24 happen in a second in the video ( which means each spike of change is registering to the clock ).

and it's not really a full wave of rotation...

the audio is 48HZ according to the ticks of the relays...

[shylo]

https://youtu.be/rtSbDTcnsYI don't know if this posted

[r2fpl]

Pierre,

Can You help us;

Do you use the principle of Figuera?

like: S|N (coil) N|S (coil) S|N .....N|S .....

or just Back EMF?

It would help in understanding


Thank You !

[d3x0r]

Pierre,

Can You help us;

Do you use the principle of Figuera?

like: S|N (coil) N|S (coil) S|N .....N|S .....

or just Back EMF?

It would help in understanding


Thank You !

what is 'coil' ?  the pickup coil?
In Figuera, one side approaches, the other receeds; so N-N is appropriate...
this is more about moving maintained magnetic fields... I suppose... you could do an offset such that well... drive every coil as the same polarity, and you get opposite 'virtual poles' I think Bedini called them inbetween that are opposite... like bedini was all same polarity magnets...  maybe just run 3 + with 0 -... 
(am trying to avoid 'N' and 'S' because specifics don't really matter; unless you believe sprouts grow better when exposed to a South field ala Ken Wheeler which may be relevant in other applications)


back EMF is not the primary function; if it was, the heavy power transformers to the capacitors wouldn't have to be plugged into the device output.
The coils are only like 1-2mH; and with a reasonable 0.5-1.4 resistance  0.5 Ohm, 1.5mH, loses its current over 5ms   1.5Ohm reduces the delay to 3ms (more or less)...
ya sorr I'm kinda rambing...

T-1K did say something about near coils, and I guess they are all shorted, which means they're going to develop as 'eddy currents' or sorts...
could wish I had a 36 channel scope with current probes on each coil
I don't know; there's 4 coils between 1, 6;  ( 2,3,4,5 ) the 2 and 3 are more under 1 (coupled to) so they should end up getting opposing poles near... as coil 1 and 6 are first energized.. and 4 and 5 are more under 6 than 1, so they should end up getting an opposing pole to 6... which then the increasing current in 2, and 5 are mutually exclusive...   Though that current will dampen by the resistance of the coil... which then counter induce in the original 1 and 6 as their current diminishes but the other remains?   switching is 16ms...
Then in the second step 2, 7 turn on, for 16 ms... then 1, 6 turn off... but really short so whatever current their coils have can continue.... (shorted). 

I don't know... how much ARE the coils coupled?   

---
I do have a question for clarification; the 700 feet of bifilar windings; is that 700 each or total (350 each?) 
700/11 = 63x the wire for outer windings? (based on 11 feet of gotoluc's windings)

----

Someone mentioned a 36 vaned motor... 36 slots had 35 vanes.

[r2fpl]

what is 'coil' ?  the pickup coil?
In Figuera, one side approaches, the other receeds; so N-N is appropriate...
this is more about moving maintained magnetic fields... I suppose... you could do an offset such that well... drive every coil as the same polarity, and you get opposite 'virtual poles' I think Bedini called them inbetween that are opposite... like bedini was all same polarity magnets...  maybe just run 3 + with 0 -... 
(am trying to avoid 'N' and 'S' because specifics don't really matter; unless you believe sprouts grow better when exposed to a South field ala Ken Wheeler which may be relevant in other applications)


back EMF is not the primary function; if it was, the heavy power transformers to the capacitors wouldn't have to be plugged into the device output.
The coils are only like 1-2mH; and with a reasonable 0.5-1.4 resistance  0.5 Ohm, 1.5mH, loses its current over 5ms   1.5Ohm reduces the delay to 3ms (more or less)...
ya sorr I'm kinda rambing...

T-1K did say something about near coils, and I guess they are all shorted, which means they're going to develop as 'eddy currents' or sorts...
could wish I had a 36 channel scope with current probes on each coil
I don't know; there's 4 coils between 1, 6;  ( 2,3,4,5 ) the 2 and 3 are more under 1 (coupled to) so they should end up getting opposing poles near... as coil 1 and 6 are first energized.. and 4 and 5 are more under 6 than 1, so they should end up getting an opposing pole to 6... which then the increasing current in 2, and 5 are mutually exclusive...   Though that current will dampen by the resistance of the coil... which then counter induce in the original 1 and 6 as their current diminishes but the other remains?   switching is 16ms...
Then in the second step 2, 7 turn on, for 16 ms... then 1, 6 turn off... but really short so whatever current their coils have can continue.... (shorted). 

I don't know... how much ARE the coils coupled?   

---
I do have a question for clarification; the 700 feet of bifilar windings; is that 700 each or total (350 each?) 
700/11 = 63x the wire for outer windings? (based on 11 feet of gotoluc's windings)

----

Someone mentioned a 36 vaned motor... 36 slots had 35 vanes.

Yes, pickup coil.  The idea is to make Pierre clarify what is going on.
When you reach the rotor you will understand that only in two places power is transferred. Left and right side coil (rotor).

My rotor coil is 0.9mm about 300m single wire. 6,67ohm and 850,5mH

See my video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE1ilIot8tU

Only one first coil worked.  Time delay is 3 ms.

I'm trying to understand ...