Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[pix]

Did you use the diodes in the way he tells us?  He says that the diodes are very, very important as they negate losses =  I speculate maybe negates Lenz?
Clearly, pulsed squarewave with variable duty cycles and frequencies is the experiment to be conducted here.
Also, use a magnetometer and see which frequency/duty cycle combination gives the biggest magnetic field.
Also, use very fast diodes. No two diode types are the same.
He also says that you can keep the transformer together by using ordinary cheap insulation tape.
I hope this helps.

Of course diodes are cruicial to use transformer as flyback.
With typical flyback converter where magnetic path is closed and 2 coils close coupled there is about 90% efficiency. It is just conversion of low voltage to higher voltage ,energy is fransferred from primary to secondary with a loss. No energy is stored in the ferromagnetic core, energy from primary is only transferred to secondary.
Diode in secondary coil is blocking current flow during magnetization, so there is no Lenz counter magnetic field from secondary.
Flyback primary is driven by pulses, or via diode if supply is sinus, we need only half period of sinus for magnetization and zero for demagnetization period.
Nothing special so far.
With Melnichenko setup, you see that magnetization coil (primary) is separaterd from the ferromagnetic core where secondary output coil is wound.
This separation is important for two reasons:
- to magnetise ferromagnetic core of secondary a weak magnetic field is enough, if you look on hysteresis graph of any soft ferromagnetic material it is nonlinear, that means small external magnetic field causes large internal magnetic field in that ferromagnetic material. Multiplication is equal to relative permeability. Transformer steel has about 4000, good nanoperms 20000-200000. This is multiplication factor of magnetic field.
- when magnetisation coil is separated from the core, during magnetisation, core creates it's own, separate amplified magnetic field. That field permeates outside core through the air and most of it ( Melnichenko says about 90%) is closing back to the core, only small portion is passing by magnetizing coil. Remember magnetic energy is stored in the air, outside core.
Once magnetisation current is interrupted, amplified field created by ferromagnetic core vanishes, collapses inducing EMF in the secondary windings.
I am going to test this setup.


Cheers,
Pix

[Sergh]

1 No switching: I watched the Aquarium 1 video and saw Kapanadze blow a transistor when switching between various devices. This told me immediately that he was no engineer. It would have been simplicity itself to put easily reachable fuses all over the device to protect the circuitry. I would have done - especially in front of potential investors.

In order for us to think correctly, we need to understand the following:


- Who is Tariel Kapanadze? Is the lone inventor?


No. He himself said this several times, on his video. Long ago there was some group of people, probably scientists, who investigated gravitational effects. Interesting results were obtained by this group, but there was no further progress in the direction of monetization. Kapanadze, and probably some others, left this group and began aggressive marketing.


And you yourself saw how many people's near theses devices.

   It is probably necessary to perceive Kapanadze as a project manager. Or even as a brand, a public relations person.

   Transformers, wires, transistors - all this is visible tinsel that performs auxiliary functions. Science in Georgia is in a bad financial situation and they will not be able to spend money to make quality prototypes.

   Developing the technology to produce of the main working element, which of course is heavily hidden, could in the past take thousands of man-hours of team work. Even if Kapanadze wanted to give clues and even reveal a secret, he had no right to leave his team hungry.
The device broke down during the demonstration to the investor - maybe it was planned that way. Why invest in a fully working device, it's easier to buy one.
You underestimate the tricks of the other side.

2 The device had to output 2 kilowatts for hours and hours. It did; and worked for 4 and a half hours before it was time to finish the demonstration.
I think that this information rules out your interesting hypothesis.
So let's keep analysing the first video because I believe it gives away the most secrets.

I did not write anywhere that Kapanadze has a chemical power cell in the coil, the components of which are irreversibly consumed.
If there, for example, water decomposes into oxygen and hydrogen "in situ", then it is then converted back into the same water.
Ideally, nothing from visible is consumed, and even a small supply of components can be enough for a long period of work.
I suggest watching the ancient video of Tariel Kapanadze, "Auto on the water":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIMXgLuq6gA
Kapanadze invented many different principles of free energy machines, to each what he likes? Or just one?

PS: Prehistory of "Auto on Water" Kapanadze:
For the first time this car is mentioned in the GreenBox video. In the same place, Tariel mentions the Filipino Daniel Dingel, who, as it were, stole this invention from Tariel. 
Tariel found the info about this Filipino from the ordinary magazine "Behind the Wheel", apparently in 2001. So the invention of the "car on the water" must be dated earlier than 2001.
https://www.zr.ru/archive/zr/2001/04/avtoprobieg-na-lunu

[r2fpl]

From antigravity to hydrogen? Is it the same?
We don't know anything about the hydrogen engine. We do not know whether it was supported by fuel, e.g. gasoline or oil. We don't even know if it has anything to do with the 2004 device. There's also a pressure device that doesn't fit anything at all. This way my dishwasher fits too.

I understand that we have to take everything into account, but we don't have to take it for granted. Kapanadze has had many interests before, and they are not necessarily related. I think so.
the question is? which are the same effect? because maybe all of them.
ok. hydrogen engine: maybe it's not the engine! but about how to produce hydrogen. The only thing that came to Kapanaga's mind was the use of hydrogen for an internal combustion engine. Correct.
So our FE is a way to produce hydrogen in large quantities !!!???
Hydrogen as energy can be converted to KWh and to get 5kW you need a certain amount of hydrogen per second right.
So how much hydrogen is needed for 5kW/s?

[r2fpl]

Did you use the diodes in the way he tells us?  He says that the diodes are very, very important as they negate losses =  I speculate maybe negates Lenz?
Clearly, pulsed squarewave with variable duty cycles and frequencies is the experiment to be conducted here.
Also, use a magnetometer and see which frequency/duty cycle combination gives the biggest magnetic field.
Also, use very fast diodes. No two diode types are the same.
He also says that you can keep the transformer together by using ordinary cheap insulation tape.
I hope this helps.

Yes, I know that diodes only stop the LENZ very quickly! Ordinary diodes let through!

[r2fpl]

https://keelynet.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/daniel-dingel-water-powered-car-inventor-gets-20-years-for-swindling/