Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Sergh]

r2fpl, Kapanadze in 2001 could not be connected in any way with the geographically remote Filipino Daniel Dingel, and these Tariel words about the theft of the principle of the device by the Filipino are the usual story that the secret of the invention is in danger and can be stolen, so he could not tell anything in detail. 

From antigravity to hydrogen? Is it the same?

Kapanadze says about gravity and antigravity research, but initially on this video says "Gravity forces":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BJnrlUbb58

But not Einstein, Dirac and Schrodenger's cat etc.
I assume that they studied the rise of groundwater in various types of soils and related topics. As a result, some material was probably found and a process was developed that made it possible to break the water molecule with little energy consumption.
Something along these lines:
https://openpress.usask.ca/soilscience/chapter/soil-physics/

Hydrogen bonding

Because of the polarity of a water molecule, the electronegatively charged oxygen atom can develop an attraction force with the electropositively charged hydrogen as two water molecules come close together. This attraction force creates an intermolecular bond known as hydrogen bond between the protons of the hydrogen atom of one water molecule and the oxygen atom of the other. This force of attraction effectively bonds water molecules together.

Adhesion and cohesion forces

Hydrogen bonds create two forces that are responsible for water retention and movement in soils (Figure 4.8a). The attraction force between water molecules and solid particles is known as force (force between two different materials). The attraction force between water molecules is known as force (force between similar materials). Generally, adhesion forces are much stronger than the cohesion forces as water molecules are tightly held onto the soil-solids (also known as adsorption). These tightly bound water molecules further hold onto other water molecules through cohesion forces. Together, the adhesion and cohesion forces make it possible for soil solids to hold water and to allow water movement through the soil. Increasing distance between the water molecule and the solid surface decreases the binding attraction between the water molecule and the solid surface, thus soil water farther away from soil colloids may not be retained onto the surface of a soil particle (e.g., clay).

Capillary rise

If a cylindrical glass tube is kept in contact with a liquid media such as water in a reservoir open to the atmosphere, water will spread over the inside wall of the glass tube. Due to the stronger adhesion force, the attraction between water molecules and the glass wall will be stronger than the cohesion force between the water molecules. Due to this attraction, the glass wall will "pull" water and there will be a rise of water within the glass tube. This is known as capillary rise (Figure 4.8b). The height of capillary rise of water will be determined by the closeness of the glass walls which creates the attraction force and holds the water against the force of gravity. If the walls are close (or the diameter of the tube is small), the adhesion force will be stronger than the cohesion force, and the water will rise higher. On the other hand, if the diameter of the tube is larger, the cohesion force may surpass the adhesion force and the height of rise of water may be small. Consider the situation in soil, where soil pores created by soil particles may be considered as a buddle of tubes. Now, small pores created by small sized particles (e.g., clay) will have a greater height of rise of water compared to the large pores created by the large sized particles (e.g., sand).

https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Soil_Science/Digging_into_Canadian_Soils%3A_An_Introduction_to_Soil_Science/01%3A_Digging_In/1.04%3A_Soil_Physics

[pix]

Subject derailed into hydrogen and antigravity.
In Kapanadze device of interest I could only see wires, coils ect.

[r2fpl]

r2fpl, Kapanadze in 2001 could not be connected in any way with the geographically remote Filipino Daniel Dingel, and these Tariel words about the theft of the principle of the device by the Filipino are the usual story that the secret of the invention is in danger and can be stolen, so he could not tell anything in detail. 

I agree.

Kapanadze says about gravity and antigravity research, but initially on this video says "Gravity forces":

How to relate the gravity of a mechanical device to an electronic one with coils!?

[Sergh]

How to relate the gravity of a mechanical device to an electronic one with coils!?

In all his devices, Kapanadze uses the same process, but in different ways.
Such inventions do not come to mind in batches. Einstein did not create many theories to choose for everyone to find their own. This is impossible.

Compare the sound:

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4HCPrB-KB0

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8hvZfw4Z7g

[r2fpl]

In all his devices, Kapanadze uses the same process, but in different ways.
Such inventions do not come to mind in batches. Einstein did not create many theories to choose for everyone to find their own. This is impossible.

Compare the sound:

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4HCPrB-KB0

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8hvZfw4Z7g

An interesting comparison, especially since Kapanadze showed a pressure device. This sound is not related to the generation of electricity, but to the movement of the discs! Why ...
See this trag: https://youtu.be/Z4HCPrB-KB0?t=657   (turn the sound full up)
At this point, the device is running already generating FE. Only the moment of switching on the transformer can be heard - the impact of the magnetic field.