Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[lancaIV]

Getting the surplus power/energy/work/force output/input performance con-/inverter,will the ownership help You to react against 1000 metres hight Hyper-Tsunamis,when Antarctica and Arctic many kilometres thick ice-shields went the mountains down ?
States their economy,social and finance system :

Northeurope,Middleeurope: tilt
Canada,USA : tilt
Russia : tilt

Low hight earth ground countries with coastal lines

Mountains,loosing their formation when the ice,glueing the stony material,melts through higher permanent average ambient temperature !
Eathquakes because the lost of the heavy weight from the ice,pressing the land below down,let expand  the ' 'hidden' real earth shield surface areal !Tension on the shelf frontiers,tension-release,quakes !


......Ene,meme,muh und raus : biste !


Wellcome DEVOLUTION !

wmbr
OCWL

[pix]

@nix
Transformers do not store magnetic energy in the core. They are not tesigned to operate by "storing" magnetic energy, but to transform energy from primary to secondary by action of magnetic fluxes.
Flybacks and other converters work by "storing" energy in magnetic field. But in this case what you put "IN" you will get "OUT" minus losses.


Quote: "Adding a airgap + a magnet is not the only way to get OU out of a flyback. If that was so only transformers with airgaps would be reported as flyback/backEMF OU but that is no the case."[/size]


You forgot about a diode. It is a combination of three: switching PM flux + air gaps+ diode.

[pix]

@nix
Good luck then. You found OU in flyback and transformers.
Now implement your ideas, get rich and this site could be closed .


Cheers,
Pix

[kolbacict]

Have you checked something yourself? On YouTube, they saw how it spins, but did not notice the thin wires from the outlet?
Do you have measuring instruments besides eyes, fingers and screwdrivers? Is there sufficient education to make accurate electronic measurements?

Ну вот... Убрали Веслика и началось... Зря убрали.

[floodrod]

I am probably crazier than Nix.  I believe Tom Bearden is essentially correct.

I think all induction is OU in it's raw form..   We input power and get rewarded with a magnetic field. Then when we induct, we get rewarded again with a 2nd magnetic field that is equally as strong as the first (minus inefficiencies)..  **lorentz reciprocity principle***..   Every ounce that we induct, gets induced again into the primary..

The stumbling block is the current direction which the induction occurs.  In a transformer, lorentz reciprocity induction sends the excess produced energy straight to the negative side of the source.

This is why I am so fascinated currently with the idea of capitalizing on the positive biased sinewave, especially the emptying (depleting) part of it.  I think lorentz reciprocity principle can be reversed with the right setup.

BUT I admit- I have no proof, so I will not argue that it is correct UNLESS I can prove it.