Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze and other FE discussion

Started by stivep, May 26, 2018, 01:48:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 151 Guests are viewing this topic.

F6FLT

Quote from: Belfior on December 19, 2018, 09:48:18 AM
...
What if you form a changing electric field before the charge carriers move? There will be voltage induced, but no energy lost

How do you change an electric field without moving charges?

You have to move the charges of the source of this field, and this displacement will influence other charges which will form the induced current.

19th century electromagnetism is a simplification, very practical for engineering, but using concepts that do not directly correspond to elements of reality (such as a "flux").

There are only charges surrounded by their coulomb field, and only one force, the coulomb force f=q1.q2/(4.π.ϵ0.r²).
For convenience we say that the charge q2 creates a field E=q2/4.π.ϵ0.r², and that a charge q1 in this field is subjected to a force F=q1.E.
From these two only elements of reality that must be considered, the charge with its field, and the coulomb force, everything else results directly, through the play of movements as described by relativity. Only relativity explains electromagnetism without ambiguity or paradoxes.

In 19th century electromagnetism, we have the Lorentz force F=q.vxB that deflects a charge moving in a magnetic field. But from the point of view of the charge in its proper referential, v=0 so there is no Lorentz force. The charge only sees an electric field, this field being E=vxB, which is the result I was talking about, related to the relativistic effect of velocity on the charge's electric field: when a charge moves, its coulomb field compresses in the direction of travel and extends transversely. This is a consequence of length contraction. Transverse reinforcement is what we see as a "magnetic field".

The magnetic field is the Lorentz transform of the electric field, and vice versa. It's the same physical reality, seen from different points of view because of relative movements. Take one and you see an electric field, the coulomb field, take another and you see what you call a magnetic field which is the coulomb field deformed by the speed.
The interplay of forces between the charges is only that of Coulomb's forces, taking into account the relativistic effects on the electric field as soon as charges move, and possibly the delay of mutual influence related to time needed for a field to be built.
The charges act in the same way on each other, whether they are on the source side or the destination side and the reciprocity prevents an action without reaction. Sorry, not the right way for free energy, we have to be much more smarter!  ???

ramset

 AG..Quote
WHAT DO YOU THINK THIS IS ALL ABOUT ?

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/06/27/nikola-tesla-fbi/

Chet never mind Marathon bars here is a clue is she really singing sail away or something else |?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zkjQVh5KmQ
end quote
Well not certain about the Tesla Link but the ENYA song my favorite and sailing my passion...and here at the 9 min 30 sec  Mark is sailing OU IMO a sailboat sailing 30 MPH for thousands of miles in no wind [just ...Gravity Flow?.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9-QQx_JynU&feature=youtu.be&t=560

       -------------------
and also during intermission at Wesley's theater ,I see the one glove Challenge by TinMan to Smudge  above ...on another possible impossibility ??
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3684.msg70549;topicseen#msg70549


Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

magpwr


Hi Everyone,

Before commencing discussion.Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year in advance.
------
2 Songs I would like to delicate just once this year-
One for Russian comrade/member whom indirectly assisted to translate some of the important Akula speech some time ago.This which I have previously attached in a another kapanadze topic some time ago.

Николай Емелин - Рукава
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPRIlt1MOKw

Another song for rest of the Audience.
Hozier - Take Me To Church (Dj Mike Radio Edit)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh0J3xRPe40

-------------------------------------
Now back to topic

I need to relay this to some audience whom are researcher or maybe a book worm.

A very important but easy to read article related to Electrical power-
Knowledge of Power is Power

https://www.egauge.net/blog/2015/09/30/knowledge-about-power/

-----------------------------------------

I  would need any member to advise me if the ions emitted by tesla coil is considered diamagnetic or paramagnetic.Any Tesla setup for specific ion output?

Kindly explain some details as mention above which will assist me to understand certain experiment which I have limited knowledge on what i am dealing with.


Then I can proceed to reveal some more findings  related to Akula Kapanadze coil. :o 
If I am satisfied with the explanation.

ramset

sorry to interrupt Magpwr important question ,But I have been trying to get this Link to work ..The work of Andrey Melnichenko discussion and observations ,if tests show promise a topic will be started here.these claims have been made for many many years ...trying to see why its taking so long [if provable]

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3683.msg70540;topicseen#msg70540
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

SolarLab

Hi magpwr,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuR3TPcf7f8
Might help a bit - paramagnetic Cu... 

https://chem.libretexts.org/LibreTexts/Mount_Royal_University/Chem_1201/Unit_2._Periodic_Properties_of_the_Elements/2.07%3A_Magnetic_Properties_of_Atoms_and_Ions 

http://periodictable.com/Properties/A/MagneticType.html

  Looks like Cu = paramagnetic  [copper metal] (somewhat affected by magnetic field)   
   and   Cu+ = diamagnetic   [copper ion] (not affected by magnetic field) {some theories}.

If the ion(1) is in "Air" (70% Nitrogen [paramagnetic] and 30% Oxygen [diamagnetic] 
or an electron particle {or energy wave} moving through the Air [?], or vacuum (CRT) [?].
(1) Ion is basically an atom or molecule where the number of electrons does not equal the total number of protrons, 
      yielding a positive or negative charge.

Example: Magnetic field (yoke) action on an electron beam (fast ion stream from hot cathode) directs the charged
electrons to a "pixel" location on a CRT's inner phosphor face. The released energy lights up the pixel.

Magnetic fields steer or deflect the electron beam but do not affect the electron speed, the HV [grid] does that.

[ ??? I could be wrong] It's a complex process at this detailed level and there are conflicting theories to pick from.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sENgdSF8ppA 

Lots of "stuff" to ponder and sort out!