Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Void]

Hi Acca. I could be wrong of course, but I tend to think that Kapanadze's setups might
actually be legit, otherwise I wouldn't have spent so much time on it already.

Kapandze's 2004 setup, which I think was his most open and simple setup that I have seen
on video anyway, is sure a puzzler though.

Wesley, or anyone else, do we know for certain if Kapanadze's coil assemblies in his
2004 demo or green box demo, or other demos, had any sort of ferrite or metal core?
I seem to recall Kapanadze stating in an interview that he only uses air core windings,
otherwise he won't get the effect. Kapanadze could say things like that to try to mislead people however.
Has it ever been established whether his coil assemblies were really only air core coils?

[Hoppy]

Kapandze's 2004 setup, which I think was his most open and simple setup that I have seen
on video anyway, is sure a puzzler though.

Yes indeed and its strange to me that he ran this device on a cluttered work bench, given that his intention was to presumably persuade the audience that he had a self-runner.

[seychelles]

VOID IF HE WAS NOT LEGIT , THEN ALL THOSE ELECTRICIAN ,ENGINEERS WHO WERE THERE VERIFYING
THE DEAL ARE A BUNCH OF ........

[Belfior]

create HV HF using LV -> HV cap -> pulse to a trafo -> OU

if you charge the a cap bank 35000 times per second with 9000V, that is a significant charge in the caps. The load wants amps which is charge/time

Everybody seems to think it is something magical and they always have to pull in nuclear freaking fusion or Schuman frequencies or solar eclipses.

[myenergetic]

Hi AlienGrey 
On your Reply #235 on: July 04, 2018, 03:27:21 PM

Without having a degree from oxford UV in electromagnetism displacement of Maxwell's equations the argument should be properly defined.

1, If your argument is based on the Maxwell displacement current then "Maxwell displacement current" either in vacuum or in dielectrics, neither generate magnetic field nor are sensitive to external magnetic fields. In other words current in dielectrics "The polarization current" does not act with potential forces on other currents and "external magnetic field" does not react with kinetic forces to the action of other currents.

2, Displacement current is a quantity appearing in Maxwell's equations that is defined in terms of the rate of change of electric displacement field. Displacement current has the units of electric current density, and it has an associated magnetic field just as actual currents do. However it is not an electric current of moving charges, but a time-varying electric field.

To conclude the above I quote from
"Harry McLaughlin" https://www.quora.com/profile/Harry-McLaughlin

a. A "changing" electric field CANNOT create a magnetic field
b. A "changing" magnetic field CANNOT create an electric field "end of quote"

3,The so-called "displacement current" term (1/4π) ∂E/∂t is not some current density generating magnetic field, as Maxwell supposed. This term gives information about the conduction currents which have been interrupted in the neighborhood of the reference point.

4, For what it worth, we cannot measure magnetic field produced by displacement currents but we can measure exactly the field of the interrupted conduction currents. Even if the details are not so obvious and require a skill to understand but what the equations imply is that the electric and magnetic fields depend only on the source charges. It is our orientation relative to the source charges and their motions that give rise to the details of the fields we measure.

From Maxwell basic equations the only sensible is the existence of εo and µo
∂E/∂x=-Zo ϵo  ∂E/∂t
∂H/∂x=-μo/Zo ∂H/∂t

And they express that the E field causes the E Filed and The H field causes the H field
WOW what a discovery!!!!

The Equations only express that E and H fields are co-existent, co-substantial, and co-eternal like any two perpendicular sides of a brick neither the length affects the width or the width affects the length.

Hope it helps
jj