Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Void]

Wesley, Patent US20150102676A1 appears to still be in application review status.
These 'Earth Energies Inc' folks seem to be trying to get patents on Tesla's inventions which
Tesla already patented over a hundred years ago by making a few minor changes here and there
to what Tesla showed in his patents. They already succeeded in getting a patent granted for US9564268.
Now that to me is just not playing fair at all.

So many people are trying to make big bucks in this area by trying to lock things down with patents, which
in many cases seems to relate back to or just builds on things that have already been discovered and experimented
with by others in the past. Meanwhile the Earth is on a fast track towards disaster due to climate change.
If I find a way to make a working free energy device, I will try to find a good way to release it openly to the public,
with no patent applications at all. This would mean getting professors from universities or reputable science labs to certify
it as working as claimed first. First I have to build a working FE device however.

[onepower]

Solarlab

If you were a good student or you just wanted to please your teacher, you probably heard this and said to
yourself, "OK, energy is the ability to do work." If you were a really good student with a desire to learn or a
really bad student with a desire to point out your teacher's intellectual shortcomings, you should have then
asked the next logical question. What is work?

If Energy is the ability to do work 
and Work is a Force acting over a Distance which is in fact motion
Then all Energy is motion

As Albert Einstein said, "nothing happens until something moves"... however he forgot to mention that everything everywhere is already in motion.

Now we have a dilemma because as we all know everything in the universe is already in perpetual motion on every level thus everything present everywhere is Energy. This is why we speak of the Conservation of Energy whereby Energy is neither created or destroyed only transformed. We have never created or produced Energy, what we have done is transform one kind of motion already present into a force acting over a distance acting on something which produced another form of motion.

The correct perspective is to understand that everything everywhere is already in incredible motion on every level. What we do is transform this motion producing a field of force which causes something else to move over a distance causing another form of motion. When I burn wood I excite the atoms and cause some molecules (hydrocarbons and O2) to become different molecules (CO2 and H2O). The Energy as the internal motion of the atoms in the material which is transformed then appears to excite atoms in the surrounding area as light and heat which are simply another form of Energy or motion. Nothing is created, nothing is destroyed, the motion is conserved and only the form of the motion has changed.

The correct perspective is to understand we are swimming in a sea of energy as motion everywhere in everything and there is no need to create or destroy anything. We only need to understand how to efficiently transform the Energy already present into the form we want. Strange isn't it... all we have to do is co-ordinate some of the motion already present within in a single piece of wire to produce a unidirectional force on some electrons and we can produce a usable electric current. It's so simple even a child could understand it and yet here we are. Barbarians swimming in a sea of energy still preoccupied with the adolescent notion that we need to burn everything. Rip it up, chop it down, bore your holes and suck it out then incinerate it... it's so fucking absurd it boggles the mind.

[Hoppy]

http://www.scopetnm.com/test-and-measurements/earth-tester/earth-resistance-meter/mdt20kwe

[stivep]

http://www.scopetnm.com/test-and-measurements/earth-tester/earth-resistance-meter/mdt20kwe

Thank You
Wesley

[Void]

I have already commented with my ideas on why the tesla coil approach might potentially be used to exploit Earth resonances.

Here are some of my thoughts on the RomanCorp approach which Wesley seems to be experimenting with.
This also appears to me to be a potentially viable approach to try to exploit Earth
resonant frequencies due to the series resonance approach which is used. This approach may
possibly be a fair bit simpler than playing around with Tesla coils.

Although Wesley hasn't provided a lot of specific details so far about how he is doing measurements, but
if I understood his appraoch so far, Wesley seems to me to be on the right track of applying a high voltage
pulse to one ground rod and monitoring for any response results on the other ground rod. Such an approach
should help to find any resonant responses from your ground rod system. If you can't use a high voltage pulse 
or HV pulse waveform to 'excite' one ground rod, then you can try just using a signal generator set to
a pulse waveform output, and sweep from very low frequency very slowly to higher frequencies as you
monitor for any resonant responses on the other ground rod. Take note of any resonant frequencies found.

Also take note that you may have to try moving one of your ground rods around to different locations
to look for a location that seems to give the best results, so you may well want to use a short ground spike
of some type which can easily be pulled out from the ground again as you test with different ground locations.
When you are testing for any resonant responses as described above, my recommendation would be to
use as short wire lengths as possible connected to each ground rod during this testing to help minimize
skewed results due to any resonant responses/standing waves on the connecting wires them self.

See the attached circuit drawing.
My drawing takes this circuit arrangement down to what I believe is its most basic form.
Notice that secondary winding L2 and C1 are in series. You may be wondering why not place C1
in parallel across L2 instead? The answer is that if C1 were in parallel to L2 instead of in
series to L2, at the resonant frequency of L2 and C1 there should be a high current bouncing
back and forth between L2 and C2, but there is not much current pumping action applied
to the ground 1 and ground 2 points. When L2 and C1 are arranged in series between ground 1 and
ground 2, you will now (potentially at least) have a current pumping action between ground 1 and ground 2
when operating at the resonant frequency of L2 and C1.

Let's say in the intial pulsing testing stage described above that, like Wesley, you appear to see a resonant
response at 7 Hz and/or 14 Hz or whatever frequencies. These would then be good choices to try as the
resonant frequency of the L2 and C1 combination. If your local mains power operates at 50 Hz or 60 Hz,
then that would probably be a good frequency to avoid. Let's say you are going to try with 14 Hz specifically.
You could then try using an off the shelf iron core transformer of a type shown in my drawing (two separate secondaries
with a reasonably high current rating). This might not be ideal, but should be an easy way to conduct initial testing without having to
fiddle around too much. Iron core transformers should probably work well enough at 14 Hz and 7 Hz,
I would guess. Also keep in mind that you will need to use low ESR capacitor(s) for C1. 

Well, that's my ideas on a simple way of how to go about testing with this sort of arrangement
for anyone who still may have been unsure about how to go about testing with this arangement.
Wesley may have other ideas than what I describe here. These are my own initial ideas.

Test with any circuit arrangements at your own risk. Make sure you understand how to work
safely with such equipment and circuit arrangements.