IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

Please follow our discussion with ME (and before that with eccentrically1) in besslerwheel.com/forum. The title of the topic is just the same.

[George1]

An interesting discussion occurs in besslerwheel.com/forum. The title of the topic there is just the same as mentioned in our previous post. Some guys in this forum are even ready to sacrifice the third Newton's law in order to save the false law of conservation of energy. Their arguments are absurd and ridiculous. I suspect them being agents of the BIG MAFIA.   

[George1]

Please follow our discussion in https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum. Starts to be interesting.

[nix85]

i think i already responded to this thread, i'm doing it again cause ppl often don't grasp this simple phenomena at first. so called reactionless or inertial propulsion comes down to a simple natural law which can be formulated as:

Unbalanced mass spinning 360° with varying speed or oscillating within 180° or less, accelerated and deccelerated at the axis, converts centrifugal force into linear acceleration.

in other words, any time you move an unbalanced mass, such as your arm, on an axis, you are breaking all the sacred "laws" of so called physics, namely,

law of action and reaction
law of conservation of angular momentum
and law of conservation of energy

or to put it more simply, you can literally swim in space

your mind will probably resist this, but how can it be, there must be a back reaction as you slow the mass down, but no, if mass if slowed down at the axis, inertia of the arm is converted into heat or magnetic breaking, no reaction.

consider also a fluid solution. imagine a circular pipe, bottom half 4 times the diameter of the upper, there is a pump inside the system,

in short, centrifugal force will be 4 x greater in upper part despite the fact that volume of water is 4 times less.

this is due to venturi effect (continuity principle), that water in narrower part speeds up proportionally to how much narrower pipe is (https://youtu.be/UJ3-Zm1wbIQ?t=97 ) and a fact that centrifugal force is proportional to velocity squared.

here calculate for yourself http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/newtonian/centrifugal

of course increase of velocity means more friction and very low friction tube must be used, like electropolished stainless steel

of course, such design is not the best cause volume of water in bottom part is too big, this can be avoided using 45 degree knee due to a bernouli's principle, that is, that water loses pressure as it enters narrower part. as it exits into the wider part inertia is converted into static pressure (acting on all sides of the pipe) and there is no backward reaction.

picture below how it could be made

there are also other approaches to water inertial drives, like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIri1tTuaqU

[nix85]

just to add to anyone questioning the water principle i described above.. there was on keeynet.com an account i can no longer find, also site is down since owner died.

account said a guy was driving on a mountain road somewhere in us, suddenly a saucer landed in front of him. from it emerged if i remember correctly 2 ordinary americans, they asked him if he has water to share. he said yes if they allow him to peek inside. they agreed.

inside he saw a tube or a pipe going all around the circumference of the saucer and this pipe was every so often narrowing upward then again expanding downward.

the problem with this system is how strong the pump has to be to achieve sufficient velocity of water or whatever fluid they used to lift itself and the craft.