IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[George1]

To Dan.
--------------------------------
Same here -- no email from the inventor yet. Waiting.

George

[George1]

LET US PUSH FORWARD TOGETHER THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!
=================
1) We (our team) have created 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs.
------------------------------
2) Two of the above mentioned 11 technology breakthroughs (entitled "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1", respectively) are released freely here in this forum.
------------------------------
3) Our third technology breakthrough is an entirely new and revolutionary electric technology, which increases many times (twice as a minimum and more than 15 (fifteen) times as a maximum) the capacity of any standard electric battery.
------------------------------
4) Our third technology breakthrough is experimentally proved. Our third technology breakthrough has a working prototype
(accompanied by a detailed description of its principle of operation).
------------------------------
5) Our third technology breakthrough is not patented. Instead we would like to sell our third technology breakthrough as a trade secret and/or to enter a suitable kind of collaboration of mutual benefit for production of our third technology breakthrough on a large industrial scale.
------------------------------
6) Besides we would like to enter a suitable kind of collaboration of mutual benefit for a practical realization and for an industrial production on a large industrial scale of our first two pieces of theoretical research, (a) which are entitled "IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?" and "A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1" and (b) which are released freely here in this forum.
------------------------------ 
7) Contact email address: randdgroup34@gmail.com.
=================
LET US PUSH FORWARD TOGETHER THE TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS!

[nix85]

I'm posting this so that immense mis/disinformation in this thread does not obscure the simple and powerful TRUTH.

4th LAW OF MOTION STATES

ANY UNBALANCED MASS OSCILLATING WITHIN 180° OR LESS OR SPINNING FULL CIRCLE WITH VARYING SPEED CONVERTS CENTRIFUGAL FORCE INTO LINEAR ACCELERATION OF THE WHOLE SYSTEM

In practical terms, most simple device to make and prove this is with a board if you want with wheels but no wheels are needed, key part being the

SIDE WALLS

which constrain the oscillation to 90°. Simplest method is to use a rubber band attached to right and left sides and an oscillating arm in the middle. Make band slightly tense when at rest so that it gets a good stretch.

When released it will oscillate pulling against the sides while centrifugal force will pull the whole device forward with great force.

Of course, with just one arm there is also going to be countertorque giving whole device a spin along with linear acceleration. This is easily solved with two counterrotating arms.

This is an example of reactive power (oscillating rubber band) doing REAL WORK.

[nix85]

Yes, there is slight back force first half of the oscillation cause arm with weight wants to follow shortest, linear, not circular path to the side wall, so this gives slight back push, but once arm crosses the center point now the reverse happens which pulls it forward, so these two cancel out, only forward centrifugal pull remains.

Simple satellite/drone could accelerate at 1G with milliwatts cause most power is reactive only friction losses must be compensated. At 1 g to Moon in less than 3 and half hours with half way deceleration.

[George1]

To nix85.
-------------------------------
Hi there,
4th law of motion? Sounds interesting. Please give me some time to consider in depth your two last posts. I will write to you in the nearest future.
Regards,