Zero and Q device

[vasik041]

It does not look complicated to me.
Just try them.

Why would I try thing which obviously does not work ? ;)Many people by now explained it to you. So it seems that you mislead people deliberately.It's not good.

[v8karlo]

The burden of proof is with you, as you are making the claim of significantly improved efficiency. Your feedback is altering the impedance balance of the device and in the case the 'Q' replication in the other thread, compensates by increasing input current. Overall, there will be no significant efficiency gain from your circuitry as you are claiming.

What about when there is 2 sources.
Will impedance balance will be altered now? As you claim!

This is the same circuit, but returning energy to battery instead source.

There is no loop now for impedance balance claim.There is no transformer here, either.
Now it is straight forward.
What now? Any more claim?

You don't read at all? Do you?

Your reputation as expert is going down fast now.

It is about principle. As a expert you remove flaws. If you can?

[v8karlo]

Why would I try thing which obviously does not work ? ;)Many people by now explained it to you. So it seems that you mislead people deliberately.It's not good.

Not many people. You, Void and Hoopy. Standard crew.


If it does not work, lets move to your ideas and projects!






Ooops!


There is none!




Why is that?

[vasik041]

Not many people. You, Void and Hoopy. Standard crew.
If it does not work, lets move to your ideas and projects!
Ooops!
There is none!
Why is that?

Do not worry, there are projects

[v8karlo]

Do not worry, there are projects

I can not see them anywhere.


Now you claiming something what cant be seen.


Now, you are im my position with that claim.