Zero and Q device

[Void]

Void,
In that case, what if the load has low resistance?
Actually, if the load is primary of Tesla coil (low turns)?Can you answer me, I need your opinion.

I have something on my mind.
So, my thought is:
If I use Tesla coil step up, my load is low resistance Tcoil primary.
So my primary is very low resistance.

Secondary is many turns.I step up to lets say 1000V.
Then I connect another Tesla coil on that one but step down,to retrieve amps back.
So I have step up Tcoil connected to step down Tcoil.

My question is:
Can I avoid losses what you talking about connecting two Tcoils that way.
Is that what Kapanadze is doing to avoid losses?
It just occurred to me when I read your post.

Hi V8Karlo. If you use a coil instead of a resistive load, such as a primary coil for a tesla coil,
the losses in the coil itself will be minimal, but when you draw power from the secondary it causes
more losses due to drawing higher current from your power source on the primary side, and there are
always the losses in your controller switching circuitry. You efficiency will still be less than 100%.
However, if your tesla coil setup or whatever coil setup can draw in extra energy from outside the system,
then you would have a chance of reaching COP > 1. Kapandze's setup would have to be drawing in a lot
of extra energy from outside his setup to be able to self loop and also power several kW's of light bulbs.

[v8karlo]

You efficiency will still be less than 100%.
However, if your tesla coil setup or whatever coil setup can draw in extra energy from outside the system,
then you would have a chance of reaching COP > 1.

I know that this system can not be  COP>1.

I never wanted to reach COP>1 with this system.
It is impossible to reach COP>1 with this system.
I count on losses.
I need COP 0.7 or COP 0.8.
As much as I can return to source.
Additional 0.2 will be added from load.


That is my idea.
That is what I am talking all the time.
In that case I am looping energy in circle and using
whatever reminds.

(Kapanadze is adding only a little to his system from load,
and if his bulbs are in parallel then his output has little resistance)

[v8karlo]

v8karlo :
  last question: yes ! But capacitive !
I think you are in the " L"- stage, but soon thinking about L+ NN - readytouse
   Too fast, learn to make errors and learn the effect from " different opinion":
   science " says" c, why not ccw ?
   electromagnetic regime truth or quantum regime truth !   Later:
   what differ DC from pulsed DC from AC and Polyphase AC experimental on a pony brake !

Can you be little more specific?

Q system overcomes J limitations, but I need it in both phases.
Then I can stack Q and Q.
Q input is AC and Q output is AC.
Output of one Q can be input for another Q.
QQ - is that what you suggest?

Or did you think about QZero?

[Hoppy]

Ok. Your words sounds honest.Wesley is a good guy. About Zero, what is your opinion?

Please read my posts from page 125 onwards on Wesley's thread.

[v8karlo]

Please read my posts from page 125 onwards on Wesley's thread.

OK.