Zero and Q device

[v8karlo]

v8karlo, you have shown yourself here to be not only quite nasty, but also
very dishonest and very delusional. I was thinking to take time out of my busy schedule to replicate
your 'zero device' and do some proper measurements just to demonstrate to you that your 'zero device' is nowhere
near over unity (AKA free energy), but I can see now that my doing so would be a complete waste of my time.

Void,

You always think and always do nothing.
I am posting only inside this topic for the time being, how could be I nasty for you.
I am telling the truth, that is what bothers you. You know that you are pushing too far every time over and over.

You are bulling me now and many times in the past. And you still don't wanna try the circuit.

You wan't to be respected only because you are thinking that you are always right, but you will never try to assemble circuit.

You wanna others to follow you in that process of yours "always right thinking" because you are smartest person in the world.

You did not assemble Zero circuit but you are still thinking it can not work and others have to follow your thought.

Don't force me to show you more from my emails about your thinking.


You and your crew of thinking people will not provide any idea or solution ever. That is the fact.
You proved it many times till now. What is left for you then?
To bully others so you can be great in their eyes!
That is only thing what you have left!

Void has no ideas, Void has no solutions, Void has nothing to show.

Great expert!

That is why I am nasty to you.

[v8karlo]

You can not go against intelligence without intelligence.


You are bullying me over and over, I didn't bully you.

[v8karlo]

v8karlo, you have shown yourself here to be not only quite nasty, but also
very dishonest and very delusional.

You are thinking now!
How can I be great in the eyes of others again?
What to answer now? What answer will make me smart?


You showed what you are. You can't any more.

[NickZ]

   Karlo:   Calm down, no one is killing anything.
   I ask you how you determined a 3 times increase in current, But, I get no answer.   The important thing (for us) is not that the one bulb is brighter than the other bulb. The main thing is the comparison of the input to the output readings. To really see if the circuit has merit, or not. Or, which one of the three circuits actually does something unusual.
   Sorry, I do get confused with all three different circuits, at times.  However, some nice clear input to output readings would help.
   

[NickZ]

My explanation for the operation of the 'Zero' circuit: -

Using my 25W bulb having a cold resistance of 204R, the bulb in series with a 10uf cap and diode, the bulb does not visibly flash on connection to a 240V mains supply. However, it will flash with a 20uf or higher value cap. The difference is due to the reactance of the capacitor allowing sufficient current to heat the bulb filament to a glow in the case of the 10uf cap. The combined series capacitance of C1 to C4 in the zero circuit is around 5uf, thus no flash.

When the transistor is switched 'ON' and conducts on one phase of the mains supply, caps 1 to 3 effectively discharge in parallel to a much lower resistance output circuit, via steering diodes, to common output rails to which L2 is connected. The combined currents through the lower resistance, discharged from caps 1 to 3 are sufficient to heat the filament of L2. However, L1 cannot light on this phase as the diodes in series with the caps are reverse biased. The caps are now discharged ready for re-charge on the next phase when the transistor is switched 'OFF'.

Altering the power rating of the bulbs and cap values will alter the impedance of the input loop to an extent whereby LI may be seen to glow together with L2.

   V8Karlo:  In case you missed it, this was Hoppy's explanation (above) of the difference in bulb brightness, and what is causing that on that particular circuit replication, in his opinion.
   I personally tend to trust his expertise in the above explanation.