A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[gyulasun]

Hi George,

It is good you have appeared again here.  Probably a 800 page long report is not needed, instead what you offer as a severely shorted version sounds good.  From my part I have mostly the same questions I already wrote,  let me write them here too:
1) what efficiency numbers did you find which consistently were > 1? 
2) what liquid did the burning Hidrogen heat up? Was it water? or a solution (liquid mixture)?
3) What was the DC current level (mA, Amper) used for the electrolysis to obtain Hidrogen?
4) Why did not you consider the created Oxigen, besides Hidrogen? Or no need for it? Or just avoiding the possibility of creating oxyhidrogen that may become dangerous?

I assume the data you are to provide will include the duration of the tests.

Thanks and just keep at it too.

Gyula

[F6FLT]

...
Because it seems to us that whatever experimental results of ours will be declared false by F6FLT and by people similar to him.
...

They are false until proof of the contrary, for the given reason.

Provide us with the schematics of your experiment, the details of your measuring devices and the data.
In matter of overunity and evidence of overunity, a claim accompanied by an inconsistent and simplistic theory is by far not enough.

[George1]

To floor.
-------------
Hi, floor.
Thanks a lot for your reply.
You wrote that ".....There was a topic on the forum .....  in which the idea was presented
that an industrial scale electrolysis /  hydrogen gas generator could be located at the bottom of a
mountain....". Sounds very interesting. Would you be so polite to give some more details? Where is this link
in the forum? I cannot find it.
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George

[George1]

To gyalasun.
-----------------
Hi, Gyula.
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Firstly, as if it is not an easy job to shorten severely an 800 pages report and preserve the essence by choosing the most suitable experimental data. (I am not a specialist in experimental calorimetry.)
Secondly, our calorimetry expert is not very quick in doing things. But I am constantly pressing him to be in a hurry as much as possible.
So in my poor opinion we will be ready in the very nearest future. We will fulfill all of your requirements.
Best regards,
George     

[George1]

To F6FLT
-------------------------------
Hi, F6FLT
Thanks a lot for your reply.
You wrote: "They are false until proof of the contrary, for the given reason.
Provide us with the schematics of your experiment, the details of your measuring devices and the data.
In matter of overunity and evidence of overunity, a claim accompanied by an inconsistent and simplistic theory is by far not enough."
Yes, you are absolutely right. I hope that we will be ready in the very nearest future. We will fulfill all of your requirements.
Please also have a look at my last post to gyulasun.
Best regards,
George