A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[George1]

To gyalasun.
--------------
Hi again Gyala,
Floor has sent to me the link  https://overunity.com/16302/hho-as-real-uo-system/.
A very, very interesting idea! What is your opinion?
Looking forward to your answer.
Best regards,
George

[George1]

To Floor and gyalasun.
-------------------------
I already wrote to John.K1 whose link is  https://overunity.com/16302/hho-as-real-uo-system/
In my poor opinion his idea is wonderful. As if there aren't any contradictions. What do you both think about his conception?
Looking forward to your answers.
Best regards,
George

[George1]

To Floor and gyalasun
-------------------------
John.K1 wrote:
"Hello there.
Couple days ago I was thinking about the HHO device possibly leading to OU . And why do I think this way?It is very simple- Hydrogen is lighter than an air and rise up. Imagine you break water in to the hydrogen and oxygen on the ground and leave hydrogen to rise to couple hundreds of meters on its own. In that high you burn it back in some generator (60% of electricity back to the system) and use the water as a result  to make a rest of work on its all way down.

Would it work?  Maybe in the walls of water dams or high buildings?
Just some idea."
---------------------------
We discussed here the topic with the colleagues. I would suggest a short summary of the discussion.
1) Joule's heating, i. e. generation of energy for a first time.
2) The generated hydrogen could be put inside/enters easily a baloon which could go up (being lighter than air and because of the Archimedes principle) to couple of hundred meters and could pull a load thus generating energy for a second time.
3) At the height of these couple of hundred meters you burn back the hydrogen and generate energy (heat) for a third time.
4) The generated water goes down and generates energy for a fourth time.
5) The load lifted in item 2 also goes down and generates energy for a fifth time
What are your opinions about this combination of ideas and for this further development of the conception?
Looking forward to your answers.
Best regards,
George

[George1]

Item 5 in the last post is wrong. Please excuse me. I am sorry.
Regards,
George

[forest]

Do you know this is exactly what Tesla described in his famous article  / What he didn't tell us is the whole process of extracting energy but his analogy was much more nicer being more realistic.
Imagine a lake maybe in high mountain without any possible dam. Lake is very deep. Tesla found a way to extract energy of this lake water without using a dam. You are very close.