A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[kolbacict]

why is no one answering? Is this person talking nonsense?

[George1]

To kolbacict.
-----------------------
You are obviously an absolute amateur in the field of physics. Or even worse -- you are a person of bad will and most likely an agent of the BIG OIL/BIG MAFIA. It's a shame! How much did they pay you?   

[George1]

COP = 1.35 and COP = 1.37. A simple obvious fact. It unambiguously shows the incorrectness of the law of conservation of energy. (But you have to be a highly qualified expert in electrical engineering and in electrochemistry (or in physics as a whole) in order to understand what we are talking about.)
And yet the above mentioned obvious fact (COP = 1.35 and COP = 1.37) cannot gain popularity quickly and easily among the members of the official science community. Do you have an explanation of this absurd situation?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P. S. Please look at our post of  July 04, 2020, 01:38:09 PM, in order to understand how the two equalities COP = 1.35 and COP = 1.37 has been generated.

[kolbacict]

You are obviously an absolute amateur in the field of physics.

This is mostly true.

an agent of the BIG OIL/BIG MAFIA.

But this is not so.
I'm just wondering why the other participants are silent?

[George1]

To kolbacict.
-------------------
Hi friend,
First of all I need to apologize for being as if a little more rude than necessary. It's my fault. Please excuse me for my, let's say to some extent, inadequate behaviour.
Secondly, the other participants (WHO ARE EXPERTS IN PHYSICS!) are silent because of one single and obvious reason. And this reason is the unambiguous and iron-made fact that our concept clearly shows that any standard hydrogen generating electrolyzer is actually a heater which has efficiency bigger than 1. (COP = 1.35 and COP = 1.37.)
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George