A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[Floor]

@George1

It is appearant to all who read here, that you do not understand and neither
are you seeking to understand electrolysis.

Neither are you actually looking for a free energy device.

Why do you continue to seek to perpetuate this lie ?
Have you been diagnosed with a narcissistic disorder ?

You don't really believe the simple electrolysis of water is over unity do you ?
You are lying to say so, aren't you ?

Please just accept that this over unity premise you have presented is incorrect.

Stop trying to pollute the forum with your corrupt agenda.

We await your admission, of the the honest facts.

Or are you just another cheap scammer / disinformation agent ?

[lancaIV]

george1,You makes me wondering about this ' technological potential ' !
#460 : 4 . 2/two to 15/fifthteen times capacity increase from any battery

                  actually 08/15 lead battery average 40 Wh - 80 Wh /Kg

                1 KWh/Kg enhancement possible,with ordinary lead battery ?

                Modern technology :
                0,5 -1,5 KWh/Kg performance only as Alvin Marks Qensor battery technology known !



                 How changes the charge cycles number : stay,decline,increase ?

When You have positive answers then do not answer here but go to e-platform- manufacturer,whose wants to
improve actually activity radius and combustion engine cars to e-drive mobility !


Sincere
OCWL

[George1]

To Floor
--------------------------------
1) Stop trying to convince all of us here in this forum that you are an imbecile! This will not save your a**! Your masters will not pay to you your month salary! On the contrary, your masters will punish you! Your masters will beat you! You have to run quickly! (Although I doubt that you could hide and avoid the slaps. )
2) Tell your masters that our third piece of EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED technology breakthrough, which increases many times (twice as a minimum and more than 15 times as a maximum) the capacity of any standard electric battery, costs already $110,000,000! And after 20 days this price will be increased with $10,000,000, that is, after 20 days the price will be $120,000,000.
3) Do you understand well the essence of the above item 2? Shall I repeat it again?

[George1]

To those members of good will in this forum, who are honestly searching for the truth. 
-----------------------------------------------
Let me explain the essence of the clumsy and amateur manipulation tricks of this swindler Floor. 
1) Sixteen times in a row I have been asking Floor one and same simple question. And this simple question was: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution?
2) Sixteen times in a row Floor has been avoiding to answer the above simple question by using only either "yes" or "no". Let me explain why this happened.
3) If Floor says "yes", then he would smash to smithereens the basic axioms of electric engineering as well as the expert skills and knowledge of highly qualified experts like Prof. S. L. Srivastava (Ph.D.) and his two Russian colleagues (please look at our previous posts) some 40 years ago. (Actually Floor wants to convince all of us here in this forum that three highly qualified experts in theoretical and applied physics (yet strongly separated by time, space and nationality) have committed one and same error. This is impossible.) 
4) If Floor says "no", then he must accept the validity of our OU water-splitting electrolysis concept.
5) That is how matters stand. But what could be expected of person like Floor, who asks questions like "Do you think that truth matters?"? The latter unambiguously shows Floor's gangster and swindling mentality. 

[George1]

To Floor.
-----------------------------------------------
I am asking you my question for the 17th time: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!