A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[lancaIV]

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.n-tv.de/leute/Bezos-Ex-Frau-spendet-Milliardensumme-article22239996.html
George1,offer YOU and YOURSELF ! And your solution !
Price ? Worth ? After " A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1"-topic 28 pages research and alternatives avaliation !

https://www.ideaconnection.com/inno-resources.html                             https://www.ideaconnection.com/inventions/

40 Mio.  to 10 Mio. to 1 Mio.  to 100 TSD. currency ?


Sincere
OCWL

[George1]

To lanca IV.
---------------------
Thanks a lot for your reply. We will consider carefully the links you have sent. And I will write to you in the nearest future
What is OCWL?

[George1]

THIS DISCUSSION IS FOCUSED SOLELY AND ONLY ON STANDARD DC WATER-SPLITTING ELECTROLYSIS! AND ON NOTHING ELSE!
===================
Let us try another THEORETICAL (ONLY THEORETICAL!!!!!!!) approach.
---------------------
1) V = I x R (6-1). This is Ohm's law, which is absolutely valid for any solid, liquid and gaseous conductor. Ohm's law is the basic axiom of electric engineering and there is no doubt about its validity.
---------------------------------
2) Let us multiply both sides of equality (6-1) by (I x t), that is,
V = I x R (6-1) <=> V x (I x t) = I x R x (I x t) (6-2) <=> V x I x t = I x I x R x t (6-3).
---------------------------------
3) The last equality (6-3) is the manifestation of the first Joule's law, (a) which directly derives from Ohm's law, (b) which is the second basic axiom of electric engineering and (c) which is absolutely valid for any solid, liquid and gaseous conductor. There is no doubt about the validity of the first Joule's law.
---------------------------------
4) In a standard DC water-splitting electrolysis however, while current flows through the electrolyte (which is a liquid conductor), a certain amount of hydrogen of mass m is released. The mathematical expression of this process is given by the equality m = Z x I x t (6-4).
---------------------------------
5) If the released hydrogen of mass m is burned/exploded, then an additional portion of heat H is generated. The mathematical expression, related to the generation of this additional portion of heat H, is given by the equality H = m x (HHV) = Z x I x t x (HHV) (6-5).
---------------------------------
6) Therefore in order to keep the correctness of the input/output energy ratio of the process we have to add (Z x I x t x (HHV)) to the right side of equality (6-3), that is,
V x I x t = I x I x R x t (6-3) <=> V x I x t < (I x I x R x t) + (Z x I x t x (HHV)) (6-6).
--------------------------------
7) Another additional portion of energy X is necessary (a) for splitting of water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen atoms, (b) for collateral chemical reactions due to the impurity of the electrolyte, (c) for forming of bubbles etc., etc. Therefore we can write down the inequality  V x I x t < (I x I x R x t) + (Z x I x t x (HHV)) + (X) (6-7).
--------------------------------
Inequality (6-6) is an obvious violation of the law of conservation of energy for any standard DC water-splitting electrolysis process. The same for inequality (6-7).
====================
DO YOU HAVE ANY THEORETICAL (ONLY THEORETICAL!!!!!) OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE TEXT ABOVE?
====================
THIS DISCUSSION IS FOCUSED SOLELY AND ONLY ON STANDARD DC WATER-SPLITTING ELECTROLYSIS! AND ON NOTHING ELSE!

[lancaIV]

To lanca IV.
---------------------
Thanks a lot for your reply. We will consider carefully the links you have sent. And I will write to you in the nearest future
What is OCWL?

This is called first names and father-line and mother-line family names !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_name


Sincere
Oliver=first name  Christoph =  patronymics or matronymics.  W.= father-line L.=mother-line 

[George1]

To lanca IV.
---------------------
Hi Oliver,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I will write to you in the nearest future.
Best regards,
George