Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members

[stivep]

I don't criticize you for links, dear Wesley.

Yes you did  criticize me for links, as if it  was any of your business, what links I store in my Notebook.

I criticize their possible inadequacies, or your comments which are pseudo-scientific because mixing the true and the false, and I explain why by logic and scientific references.

Links and comments are for record just because I decided to quote  it or store it.
It is not important if multi billions corporation Viziv and Chevron, Texzone,  uses pseudoscientificly supported patents  issued by PO - in your opinion of course.
This is their money and they do whatever they want to do.
And you dear F6FLT  can not change it by protesting  their pseudoscientific basis to me on  forum,
Crowd of some Russians crumbling in that  particular part  of American Territory  can't change it too.

Criticize you for deleting messages and slandering, a sad method but the only one possible to compensate for an inability to make rational and technical arguments in response to objections, demonstrating the inconsistency of your assertions.
What you "do not want" is to see free, curious and critical minds in front of you, so it is counterproductive in research for free energy.

I'm  not here  to face challenge. Nor I care about it. I manage Notebook,- the storage place.

I'm not the smartest guy, but to my friends in science,
and people meet in symposiums, conferences, meetings
I'm quite in the right level.
And this small world  of guys is  really very demanding. 

Issue of removing links was already explained by me in previous post.

Your locked thread proves it, what you show that you want is mainly for others to be silent or to make you allegiance.

My dear F6FLT allegiance has nothing to do with my  action .
Everyone  wants  to have small place with your things  placed the way you want it.
_{You unlikely put your backyard  and garden tools in your living room.}
Other people may object but they come back to their  own small spaces and  do the same.
I strongly believe I have contributed to the benefit of this forum the largest amount of my time and money,
anyone did in the history of it till now. And I can do more.
I'm willing to do more.
For that I need to organize my space the way that gives me comfort to do so.
I have no time for arguing who is right and who is wrong in electromagnetic wave theory,
when nuisances  covers important  from my perspective elements of data with their  protests.
I may open it at any time and I remove  posts  if needed according to  character of my Notebook.
Everything must have its own designation , and
my Notebook will not serve as a garage to park someone
Car with explosives.
And it is not important if it is Volga, Lada , or T-90.( joke)

I'm sorry if I can not  make all of you happy.
It is my believe,that I serve you guys  at best I can,
but not as good as some of you may wish I could.
I'm only one of you my dear  friends , till I can not any longer.
I wish you, have all  of your answers and question solved without  urgent  necessity  to
write, in  my  small space at overunity.com

Wesley

[AlienGrey]

Wesley Hi putting the above aside you very kindly posted some very nice 'readable' circuits was there any other build
instructions on the coil winding other than already supplied?
Perhaps you have a pointer link where I can get the rest of the publication from.

Many thanks AG 

[stivep]

The Schematics  are somehow accessible.( this is not so important who has it and who make it accessible for whom )
The value of original  or accredited source of schematic is important from our typical  American practice in this field.
The credibility  of that source, and supporting comments.
So you are dealing with classical SR193 concept and its variations.
You are dealing with real value.
However it is in line  even with Viziv  and its two Tesla Towers
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/dlattach/attach/172149/image//
in its very concept.
But your opinion may be different.

I have no authorization as of yet to tell you more.
But I will,
I do not advertise my experiments and achievements  if  I have reason to do so.
But I will,
If I need/want/can  to do so.

Wesley
_{PS: There is one schematic that was not translated by me .
You can translate it for others.
Everyone can talk, but  I don't see  "much delivery" from Russian speaking SolarLab or from F6FLT.
As if they are with different business and/or activity - I  assume.}

[AlienGrey]

Yes i have already translated it (with google translate)  and ran some tests on the central 'resonator' but it's difficult
to get it to oscillate ie primary and secondary spacing  inner and outer spacing I used in test rig pic, as bigger spacing
the less switching swing till it stops and the greater the transistor heating energy wast in amps, not milliamps  (diminishes to a stop) I get 167khz using a 2SC2500 as I'm assuming BMC 60 is no of turns but Google says it's current    but if I have a much smaller wind number  oscillations also die. 

Please note come Russian words don't translate or get changed (weird), so don't ask

[NickZ]

   Wesley:    Yes, you are right about our opinions being different, concerning the unproven relation of Zenneck waves to any of the self runners that we have seen and known about to this date.   All of the above mentioned problems that you are facing is due to your unfounded opinions concerning these ideas. You are alone in that sense, as we are not of the same mind concerning your supposed "secret" source of power. Which is not what Kapanadze has mentioned, nor any other experimenter on this forum. Nor Akula, Ruslan, Stalker, etz... and much less Tesla.

    "It is in line with Viziv and it's two Tesla towers". 
    That, idea is what is making your life difficult. It is your choice. No one can take that from you.    However, I am on your side, and will some day prove just where and how any "extra energy" is actually obtained.