IEC Earth Engine First Magnet motor installed in Las Vegas

[rakarskiy]

Rakarskiy - BTW, they're already in the process of marketing it! But it takes time...
[The best way to screw yourself is to introduce a device and not be able to deliver
in a reasonable time frame (week or two at worst)] Patience!

I will be very happy with the success of the project if they overcome the technical difficulties in controlling high power.
The Holcomb generator, does not like sudden changes in power input, it is a bigger problem for it than for an electromechanical one controlled through the excitation current.

[lancaIV]

How works the grid,base /middle/peak power demand serving ?With all preservation ( grid over-demand,50-60 Hz grid frequency holding,interferences,et cet ...)
Ergo :
How to desgn a functional (portable !?) Mico-grid : safe,long life !
How the power source controles the low-middle-high load demand ?
From fixed Voltage snd RPM orientation ( public grid norm ) to variable torque,Volt and RPM power delivery controler !
  ' inverter '-technolgy called by modern heat pump drves !

DC or AC or both in one : universal !
Excitation or inrush : by start and by process work RPM acceleration and deceleration !
Excitation/Inrush current ( up to 100 times ) limiter and/or this current filtering capacitor !
wmbr
OCWL

[skywatcher]

skywatcher,

Please enlighten us as to why this is "one of most stupid things you have ever seen?"

Your detailed Analytical or Numerical Analysis would be very helpful!

Please consider all things - such as light power details, ambient day light, savings 
calculations, cost of bulk solar elements, and so forth - just curious as to what they 
all are, from an engineering prospective. 


Your opinions are always welcome but they need a bit more clarification. Otherwise they 
are just unfounded opinions based upon unfounded ad-hock evaluation. 

Thanks.

SL

I think it's very obvious, that using a lamp (which has an efficiency well below 100%) to power a solar cell (which also has an efficiency well below 100%) is complete nonsense. What other 'numerlcal analysis' do you need ?  Solar cells only make sense if the light costs nothing (like sunlight).

[SolarLab]

I think it's very obvious, that using a lamp (which has an efficiency well below 100%) to power a solar cell (which also has an efficiency well below 100%) is complete nonsense. What other 'numerlcal analysis' do you need ?  Solar cells only make sense if the light costs nothing (like sunlight).

Quick "Ball Park" - assume you only save 10% (recovered through the fixture apparatus); your lighting cost (without fixture)
is $1000/month - you have saved $100/month - over 12 months your savings are $1200 - 36 months ~ $3600, etc...
[Figure the lighting costs for a large Big Box store, school, sports complex, and so forth - might be significant!]

Hey, a penny saved is a penny earned!   

[skywatcher]

Quick "Ball Park" - assume you only save 10% (recovered through the fixture apparatus); your lighting cost (without fixture)
is $1000/month - you have saved $100/month - over 12 months your savings are $1200 - 36 months ~ $3600, etc...
[Figure the lighting costs for a large Big Box store, school, sports complex, and so forth - might be significant!]

Hey, a penny saved is a penny earned!   

You save nothing because every photon which is absorbed by the dark solar cells is missing from the amount of light you have in the room. There is a reason why the inside surface of a lamp normally is reflective, and not black.