Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]

[F6FLT]

It was Tesla who claimed longitudinal waves rather than Hertzian during his deposition for the rights to radio and he defined both.  If that does not jibe with current scientific nomenclature then fine but this was not from the guy with the issues everyone is so fond of who introduced this concept.  Further it was Tom Bearden who came up with the name scalar waves which makes no sense, scalar field yes waves no.
Tesla also specifically said his energy was non radiating.  What is also self evident is that Dr Tesla repeated adamantly he was very good at tuning...

I agree with that. Concerning Tom Bearden, if no one has ever been able to use his MEG, there is a reason: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Bearden

As for Tesla, if the energy radiated, then in the absence of a receiver, or in the presence of receivers taking only a part of it, it would be lost.
It was either a near field, which means it is not autonomous but linked to the source, or a standing wave, which means that even if there is radiation, it is that of waves moving in opposite directions, maintaining the energy in static.
Tesla was much smarter than those who today systematically want to oppose what he did to our knowledge of electromagnetism, when he was a mechanical and electrical engineer, having gone through university.

Wesley's answer, claiming a conspiracy theory from Edison or JP Morgan, people who in his opinion would represent the "current scientific position" when neither of them had any credit with real scientists like Maxwell, is childish. It means replacing rational causes with intentions.

PS - I post in this new thread. In Wesley's one where he exercises his censorship, the posts of those who do not allege his extravagant theses are systematically suppressed, including mine.

[F6FLT]

In a recent video, Wesley was seen lighting LEDs by contact with the water in a glass.

Water is conductive because it contains ions, such as seawater, or insulating when it is pure, such as distilled water. The one bought in the shops, that I use for my experiments, has a conductivity of only 2 µS. In both cases the water is a dielectric of high permittivity, which allows it to be used for antennas.
The subject is widely covered, especially over the last 5 years due to the search for efficient and broadband antennas for mobile telephony. There are many engineering papers on water antennas on the IEEE website. A good summary is available here.

Water has a high permittivity. The propagation speed of a wave in this dielectric can be divided up to 9, the square root of its permittivity, allowing tuned antennas very shorter than the wavelength in vacuum.  Wesley's experiment is easily explained: the glass of water is equivalent to a vertical antenna subjected to the close and intense field of a UHF or SHF transmitter, so it can light LEDs. No extravagant surface or Zenneck wave theory, such as Wesley's, is necessary to explain a widely known conventional phenomenon.

Some smart people have even transformed a water jet into a radiant antenna! Great! 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tIZUhu21sQ

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Westey's comments re: F6FLT restarting his "free speech" version of "Kapanadze's" original hijack.

"For me  F6FLT is trying deliberately supplying false information causing devaluation of my voluntary contribution.
I  have no benefit and no gain  continuing my activity in its  existing form."

- Westey, a while back you HI-JACKED the Original KAPANADZE threads by adding your name to them and began your original version of DISINFORMATION regarding the Kapanadze and similar devices. You do not have to "recall" this, just look backwards a few (many) pages.
- You have never posted anything original regarding Kapanzdze's unit,
- NO usable schematics, technical information, system analysis, viable theories, nor any other usable information; NOTHING.
- NO viable references to any established, or other wise, scientific theory; not even a "food for thought" idea, NOTHING.
- So, one would conclude, and rightfully so, that YOU are the DISINFORMATION shill.

Then, and Now, you attack those that are skilled in the art for EXPOSING your scheme. Your "notes are, in fact, is what they  appear to be - nothing but nonsense garbage cut and paste, meant to mislead and confuse.
You further claim, without evidence or explanation:

"Example of F6FLT disinformation   propaganda is  evident by reading his  two posts.
False assumption and wrong conclusion.

And question to you guys :
Why he is so much paying attention to me?
Why I'm  so important to him?
Why he doesn't open  new forum  with title:
Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  NickZ? 
or
F6FLT Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]?
Why he uses my name and exact  name of  Wesley's forum?

Please give me your opinion what do you think?"

- Let me answer your question as directly as possible:
- He, like most of us who sudy this technology and know the real facts, are duty bound to KEEP THE BS IN CHECK (as much as possible considering your constant and consistant flow of BS and your censoring of any possible exposure to the real truth).
GET IT!
FIN

[F6FLT]

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #2390 on: Today at 06:59:01 PM »
Note: F6FLT   opened non authorized by me discussion  forum named:

Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum [with free speech]

This is NOT WESLEY'S FORUM AND IS MADE TO IN INTERFERE WITH ANYTHING THAT MIGHT BE VALUABLE TO THE PUBLIC.

Using my name   is unfair and misleading trick made to bring attention of the crowd to his take about me.
Whoever F6FLT serves too, and whoever agenda is driving his action it should be clear that, it is  another try to
criticize only and not to contribute.

"Wesley" appears in the title of this thread, since it is the title of Wesley's thread that Wesley himself chose, but accompanied by the mention [with free speech], which leaves no doubt that it is not Wesley's thread, but the one to make the answers he censors in his own.

Using the name "Kapanadze" in the title of his thread, associated with his name, is it not an "unfair and misleading trick" to draw the attention of the crowd to him? Of course not, it would be foolish to use against him, the lamentable defamatory process he uses against others.
He discusses the Kapanadze machine, so he puts the name Kapanadze in the title. I discuss Wesley's (often pseudo-)scientific theses and his activities as a censor, so I keep his name in the title of the thread in question, nothing more normal, that's where is the matter to be discussed!

What is "unfair" is to systematically suppress posts, even purely technical ones, when they criticize his theses in addition for perfectly justified reasons, for example see above.

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

At the beginning of 2019 it became clear that the "theory of the Ruslan device operation"  was about to be postulated and could be supported by conventional (orthadox) science and engineering knowledge, as well as actually demonstrated by both computer aided engineering analysis and bench testing.

About that time panic also set in. There are many reasons for this I'm sure but we'll leave that for further speculation. However, in a fit of myopic fear, the subject took a dramatic turn. A feverous posting pace of "garbage" (for lack of a better term) and bashing began followed by censorship and out right nasty accusations and name calling.

This behavour is classic, so it's easy to recognize on the forums - when your over the target, the flack is the heaviest.

But, rest assured one theory of Ruslan's device (and many others) does hold water, devices are being tested, and the entire "package" will be released to the public in the not too distant future.

This is far too important to all of us to screw it up playing "silly little reindeer games."

FIN