Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Open Source Vs. Patenting

Started by FreeEnergy, December 17, 2006, 04:22:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Open Source Vs. Patenting

I choose Open Source
57 (63.3%)
I choose Patenting
11 (12.2%)
I choose neither
3 (3.3%)
I choose both
18 (20%)
I don't care
0 (0%)
I don't get it?
1 (1.1%)

Total Members Voted: 90

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 41
User actions

FreeEnergy

#5
December 17, 2006, 11:43:44 PM
Like Unix/Linux GNU/GPL would probably be the best way to go if you need to patent.

* see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License and http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html


peace.

lltfdaniel1

#6
December 17, 2006, 11:46:34 PM
Yes Microsoft really wants Linux gone,

http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=303152

68:16 But by this, THEIR KNOWLEDGE (science - 1 Tim. 5:20), THEY PERISH, and by this also its power consumes them.

twh 1:1 Thousands of earth years ago,far away,in this galaxy,on the morning star(venus),the Lord Guardian Of Divinity,King ruler and Guardian of the Universe,put down a revolution led by Lucifer(Iblis)

Paul-R

#7
December 19, 2006, 09:51:46 AM
Quote from: Nali2001 on December 17, 2006, 06:55:59 PM
Problem is when you have a f.e machine and you do not patent it. Sombody will come around and claim the idea as theirs and do patent it and stop all progress on the thing. You can't do a thing because they have the patent, and are sitting on it.

What you can do is:
Invent a f.e device. Patent it. BUT be fully transparant in the patent. Discribe everything. So people can fully and without hidden stuff replicate it completely. In that way a patent can become a worldwide available and free instuction manual for all.
This is true but expensive. It should be enough simply to disclose your work. It will then become "prior art", and will cause the next person's patent to fail.

The question is: How do you disclose technology with enough
publicity? What counts as "enough"?
Paul.

FreeEnergy

#8
December 30, 2006, 11:32:15 PM
yes i know GPL is for software.

this is the closest i can find in order to be "free and open source" for patenting. unless there is something else out there that i don't know of and is qualified as "free and open source" license.

the question is, is there a license out there that is qualified as "free and open source" for patenting a machine?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 ... 41
User actions