Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Open Source Vs. Patenting

Started by FreeEnergy, December 17, 2006, 04:22:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Open Source Vs. Patenting

I choose Open Source
57 (63.3%)
I choose Patenting
11 (12.2%)
I choose neither
3 (3.3%)
I choose both
18 (20%)
I don't care
0 (0%)
I don't get it?
1 (1.1%)

Total Members Voted: 90

AB Hammer

Quote from: Marsing on September 14, 2013, 02:22:23 PM
I agree RedEangle..

I vote for patent and open source,
patent  apply only for mass production, inventor get reward,
individual should can duplicate it freely,
everybody can and legitimate duplicating in home scale..

but is in this way patent works ?,

To add to your and RedEangle post
If you want free energy? learn how to build and I'll patent so I can control who builds for profit and get paid from those who build to make profit from others. But those who want to build for themselves? Go for it.

Alan
With out a dream, there can be no vision.

Alan

Marsing

Quote from: AB Hammer on September 25, 2013, 09:12:09 AM
To add to your and RedEangle post
If you want free energy? learn how to build and I'll patent so I can control who builds for profit and get paid from those who build to make profit from others. But those who want to build for themselves? Go for it.

Alan

after reading a lot, the problem is difficult to get patent, moreover about free energy.  Nice to know that you can help people patent their devices.

lancaIV

                               Patent-ing
                                 means
                                      to
                                  give as
                            "open source"
                          technical findings
                                  under
                               comercial
                         right and obligation
                           laws and orders


      There are two kinds of patent application :


               patente  for technical innovation   :
          needs physical-technical examination
      claims right monopole validation -if awarded(=accepted as new innovation)                                                  17+3=20years (under WIPO/INPI-fee paying condition)


  relatively expensive if PCT/WO-wide rights demand cause lingual translations




         patente for utlity model/process(i-material) :
                     no examination
         claims riight monopole validation 10 years.


If somebody applicate in 1/one country (f.e. Belize) worldwide an 100US$ costs utility model ,
(without the intention to speculate to worldwide WO-utility  claims rights monopole),
explaining a "free energy" device this application as "open source"-source is then
worlwide comercial free available
                 
                                  cause you - as applicant - want this ! 


There is no need for "unusefull" exagerations about "open source" or patenting
                                     it it the same medaille/medail( A-and-B-side)


In my 3/4. school class [(Roßmarktschule/Speyer(Spyra)] was beside the wall-tabula/Tafel/table a script :

a Matthaeus-Psalm(~Sure/Law-Order) :
             
                                 Erst denken ,dann sprechen


meaning                    First thinking about the facts(also pros and cons)
                                         then critizising ~judging


        First reading your and the common rights and obrigations/obligations :
this information you get from your national patent office free/gratis off-or on-line


             and 100US$ is less than the "overunity-prize-jackpot" offer


Marsing

Quote from: lancaIV on November 08, 2013, 04:09:46 AM
                               Patent-ing
                                 means
                                      to
                                  give as
                            "open source"
                          technical findings
                                  under
                               comercial
                         right and obligation
                           laws and orders


      There are two kinds of patent application :


               patente  for technical innovation   :
          needs physical-technical examination
      claims right monopole validation -if awarded(=accepted as new innovation)                                                  17+3=20years (under WIPO/INPI-fee paying condition)


  relatively expensive if PCT/WO-wide rights demand cause lingual translations




         patente for utlity model/process(i-material) :
                     no examination
         claims riight monopole validation 10 years.


If somebody applicate in 1/one country (f.e. Belize) worldwide an 100US$ costs utility model ,
(without the intention to speculate to worldwide WO-utility  claims rights monopole),
explaining a "free energy" device this application as "open source"-source is then
worlwide comercial free available
                 
                                  cause you - as applicant - want this ! 


There is no need for "unusefull" exagerations about "open source" or patenting
                                     it it the same medaille/medail( A-and-B-side)


In my 3/4. school class [(Roßmarktschule/Speyer(Spyra)] was beside the wall-tabula/Tafel/table a script :

a Matthaeus-Psalm(~Sure/Law-Order) :
             
                                 Erst denken ,dann sprechen


meaning                    First thinking about the facts(also pros and cons)
                                         then critizising ~judging


        First reading your and the common rights and obrigations/obligations :
this information you get from your national patent office free/gratis off-or on-line


             and 100US$ is less than the "overunity-prize-jackpot" offer

thank for you explanation,
but i did not go deep into kind of patent or how to patent yet.


i read  moray book,

http://kristofferhell.net/doc/sea-of-energy_henry-t-moray.pdf

is that situation  same with current situation?,
the  main problem is situation.
if not go and get patent,

every being from bowels of the earth to the moon to the mars till pluto will
come to the earth surface patenting device.

don't worry, human will be serviced first .


Marsing

Quote from: TechStuf on September 14, 2013, 02:46:36 PM
Or......if it actually works well, use it to power your own personal quad copter and buzz around doing good deeds and solving crime.  No immediate threat to the "power cartels"....

Slowly building street cred and ground support until it's time to lead the masses against the asses and their gasses. 

That you guys still sit around even speaking of "patents" and "open sourcing" disgusts me and shows how little you see of the 'matrix'.

I'm out of here.....


BUZZZZZZZ    ZZZZZ ZZZZ         zzz     z                  z


Oh crap....


Can anybody give me a lift back to my mom's basement?


i see what you call as a Matrix, that why i am here looking for enlightenment.
i only tried  to break the matrix piece by piece..
do you see?