PULSERs ONLY

[Grumpy]

Looking at pole-zero cancellation of double differentiated pulse undershoot (no current reversal)

[Grumpy]

Copied the following post from here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1761.msg26849.html#msg26849

On rotating magnetic fields and mass rotation:

I believe you are missing a valuble quality of the nature of Copper which may shed light on this concept. The major weight of the copper atom lies in the nucleus. The nucleus of a copper atom is magnetic, but its electron shell is not magnetic but electric.

If you place copper in a rotating magnetic field one of two outcomes will happen. The copper will be physically dragged along with the moving magnetic field, or if the angle intersects wire at 90 degrees you will produce an electric flow. You get torsion or EM and the two are not the same.

The mass of the copper can thus be rotated without physically moving the copper device at the electron or matter bonding point.

As the moving magnetic field intersects a wire at 90 degrees the familiar kick will emerge. If you stretch this pulse out on your scope you will notice it is a series of sine waves at the NMR frequency. Maybe about 6 sine pulses at approximastly 5 Mhz.

Copper will act like a magnet at the Proton layer and it will follow a moving magnetic field, precessing around the polar alignment. These NMR pulses were discovered in the 50's by a nobel prize winner, and then abruptly forgotten, where down to now we still believe the myth that induction and diamagnetic fields happen only on the electron shell. Not true, the Proton is very much involved in this process.

Because the Proton will lag the turn of the magnetic field due to its higher mass we get a dragging effect from that layer that pulls the electron shell into a negative or dragged state. Induction lags in time frame, and the NMR rate is the factor by which it lags.

The TPU would seem to be turning the magnetic field in the copper atoms, using 90 degree pulsing coils. To make it turn completely over takes only a syncronized pulsing scheme. The magnetic field will rotate its poles through the collector wire loop. As the poles cross the wire no current will flow and energy will move into the torsion field, as the magnetic field moves past the 90 degree angle with the collector wire the energy will shoot into the electric field and the series of very high pulses will be shot down the wire as it crosses.

The TPU is embedded in cork to stop it from vibrating to pieces. Each time the magnetic field moves between the torsion state and the Electric state it creates a small jerk and makes a physical motion of the wires.

The TPU exhibits an inertial momentum, or gyro effect because its Proton layer is in a spinning motion of its magnetic poles, this creates a "forced precession". Best guess.

The entire mass of the copper is in rotation at the nucleus, this is one quality of copper making it an AG metal.

Dave L

This makes several things that SM mentioned  "make sense" - the term "convertion frequency", the overheating, vibration, inertial effects of the TPU, the rotating magnetic field.  Placing magnets in position to increase the field or "better direct" the magnetic fields of the coil segments also makes sense.  Looks like the heat is part of the deal - might try copper tubing with circulating coolant and a radiator.

[giantkiller]

Uh oh...
I see a high speed magnetic pulse going through a pressure contained fluid.

--giantkiller. Did I make a bad connection?

[nong]

Looking at pole-zero cancellation of double differentiated pulse undershoot (no current reversal)

Thank you for pdf file.  Im trying to finish the circuit and like to see pole-zero cancellation, if I can fine the right IC's.   

Nong

[Grumpy]

Pole zero cancellation just requires a resistor across the capacitor of the CR high-pass filter - can be a potentiometer

http://solarwww.mtk.nao.ac.jp/kobayash/thesis/node38.html

and page 3.7 of this pdf file:

http://gluon.valpo.edu/physLinks/nuclearElectronics/amptut.pdf

It is my understanding that any reversal is counterproductive and detrimental to obtaining the effect, so I found this as a way to still use double-differentiated pulses by correcting the reversal.