Creating TPU Steven_Mark

[Toolofcortex]

Kajunbee, if you wanna know more, then ask Bruce_TPU to friend you on youtube

It will be more clear then on the electron ejection.

Steven Marks was a dick and never even teased us with a circuit, you see all the confusion it causes?

[Toolofcortex]

Hey you, autist kid, stop being useless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LtTerstCxU

watch these videos, then go ask Burce_TPU for a friend invite, then watch his videos, then draw me the TPU.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxVE7vWzgwsM2eoDFSWghnw

Bruce is currently the most advanced researcher, but still its not a done deal and people must press on.

[sm0ky2]

I wanted to try the double back non inductive coil, as a core.

You Smoky believe that there is no driving the core and you may be right this, and all the stuff is accomplished by bucking coils + a third coil.

Now I wonder what to do with Bruce's theory, and if infact its an undriven core.

Theres much experimentation, for a machine. Many many designs.

I think you missed it.....


It has little to do with the bucking coils.
That's just his way of amplifying it to make it usable.
Something Stiffler should have spent more time on.


The receiver is on the outside.
That $&88 in the middle could just as well be wired off to the side as an external circuit.


Make 4 pancake coils. Two are 2x the size of the other two.
Follow Stiffler's instructions and tune one to a freq. you can produce
Either with a signal generator or a timer circuit, etc.
Use that one as your reference, and wind/unwind the other pancakes until
they all spike at that tune.


Next drive the One big coil from the signal.
Put a cap across the other and sandwich it between the smaller ones.


Now bring the coil you are driving close enough for the stack to pick it up.
what you do with that output it up to you


You will need a capacitance and an inductance to get it out of there without
destructively interfering with the stacking signal.
You can do this in pretty much any way you choose.


think of the two toroids in the middle as being a 4-coil transformer
Even though it has two separate cores, the math would basically be the same if
it were all one inductive mass.
In reality there is a difference between the two, which it is my understanding that
this causes an inefficiency. because they are sloppily wound.
(and a subsequent beat freq. arising from the difference)
it really doesn't matter.

The way SM is doing that is storing it in caps between the coils to form a tank and

Kick it back to the receiver.
they weren't all bucking coil dual toroids. And half the time he covered up the middle circuit.
probably because it was too simple to show anyone.




You'd think at least some of these would be replicators at least grew up with a crystal radio kit....
We've lost and forgotten more than we could ever teach our children.....

[sm0ky2]

Something always has to drive the signal.
The most efficient way to do this is a Tesla Coil.
and how does it receive power?


From another Tesla coil transmitting the signal.
Like your radio station (without the noise)


Stiffler used a signal generator on his bench
which drove a matched coil.
The other coil(s) he made into a circuit to pick it up.


SM doesn't need to drive his source, it exists naturally.
Tesla did the same with many different sources.
The most famous one powered an automobile, tuned to the slow
binary frequency of the Zeta Reticuli twin stars.

Bruce showed us how to do it both ways.
One from a "mysterious source".....
Then one from a source that was seen.
and you can see how much work he had to put in to get just a few
to understand what he had been telling them for years.
There's enough data from him to keep a student busy for hundreds of hours.


Schools teach us to do the opposite of this.
They say it destroys our circuits, then they give us inadequate components to prove
that it will burn out the part.
Maybe 1/100 realizes the truth and attempts to use higher tolerance components and a sink.


What would happen if we designed a bridge to shake in the wind on purpose?
Do you understand what kind of power that generator would produce?
At that point you aren't talking about a "conversion rate"....

[Toolofcortex]

Is the TPU superior technology than Kapanadze?

Really? How so?

The problenm with the TPU, theres too much dicking around and not enough solid drawings on what the coil looked like.

As much as I try I find myself more frustrated the more I wish to "lock it down" a solid base design.