Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Creating TPU Steven_Mark

Started by crashangel, September 06, 2019, 02:25:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Turbo

Quote from: onepower on October 01, 2019, 06:07:23 PM
I think SM nailed it when he said nobody is going to throw this together and make it work without first having some idea how it could work conceptually.

SM made some comments I thought were interesting
I would simply rephrase what SM said -- "YOU CAN DO SOMETHING VERY SIMPLE WITH A WIRE TO GET SOME ENERGY OUT OF THE EARTH".

This was interesting however I also remember SM mentioning that the control input and the collector output both showed up on the load. So the input does something to the collectors then both the input and collector output drive the load?. To many I suspect this means very little as normally they believe the input is somehow consumed but here SM implies it is not.

If A is the input and B is the collector output then the power output to the load is actually A+B. If the output is A+B then why not use B to power the load and simply recycle A back to the input to repeat the next cycle?. As such it would seem to me that the logical place to start would be to 1) figure out how to get some energy from the Earth with a wire and 2) how to use the input in such a way that it always adds to the output.

Regards

I'm going to rephrase it in a different way.

"YOU CAN DO SOMETHING NUCLEAR WITH A WIRE TO GET SOME ENERGY OUT OF IT".

He admitted that he didnt know where it came from, he also admitted that they thought it was the earth's field because it was the obvious choice, he then wrote that there is a nuclear connection, this happened after someone from the atomic energy commission actually told him how it worked.

Please read the whole thing and not just half of it because you need a complete picture.

ramset

Turbo,To most who have been paying attention ,it is quite apparent that energy is locked up in every single piece of our reality ,there is no such thing as "still ".. all is in motion and always has been,Here on this Rock you can not see or touch or breathe anything which is not in "perpetual motion"

Your path towards harvesting energy from this "perpetual motion" should be self evident
to most who pay attention ,that is to say ...we're surrounded by Batteries or energy stores  of unimaginable potential.
plenty will play here and not question your reasoning .

There are some very serious experimenters chasing other "claims" which have come to the same conclusion as you .////
A big task is Managing the control circuits to do this...[this is all a moving target]
and you have pointed out "time has changed things" ,the systems to manage this are available now at ridiculous prices and availability .
and your suggested "magnetic cage" to contain/control things...[magnetic field ?very nice piece of information .
and for clarity ,Transmutation as a source/path to Cheap power ,indescribable power.
Tremendous gratitude here.
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

icarus

Turbo,
over the years I have built so many tpu attempts: as I all have my toroid cemetery.
In the end the impression has always been to build inefficient transformers.
And at that point, after years of TPU saga, I stopped caring about it.
Until I saw a "Creating TPU Steven_Mark" thread and started reading everything again.

Your nuclear theory is a point of view that makes sense and could explain everything.
The clues you have given us are numerous and precise, but to start we must at least know from where.
So, the fundamental information: the kicks.
How can we measure them, see them, understand that we have released them?

I don't think with an oscilloscope: if they are high-energy particles, it is more likely with a geiger counter.

What do you think about it?

Finally, the question that no one dares to ask you: where do you stand?
Did you succeed? You're okay or this thing in the long run has somehow damaged you,
in the physical or in the mind?

Thanks  for your patience and generosity

Turbo

Steven had to be able to answer 'NO' to the question does it contain any batteries.
This meant he had to improve the design to a level where it could power itself.

That's quite the turn of events when you analyse it.
The feedback makes the thing so dangerous.

He called it a furnace which feeds itself, the hotter it gets, the more fuel it gives itself to burn.

You can think in terms of chain reactions.

You can have a sub critical mass, a critical mass, and a super critical mass.

So lets look at these.

A sub critical mass does not have the ability to sustain a chain reaction.
A critical mass is able to sustain a chain reaction.
In A super critical mass the chain reaction will proceed at an increasing rate.

There is a quote in the doc:
Quote
the only thing that will stop a red collector is the disintegration of the matter acting as a receiver. IE. the wires all burn up.

This is not to say that is is not possible to create a device that is safe and that does not have the dangers of the runaway event but one that has to be powered in a different way as in the feedback mechanism will have to be either removed entirely, or modified to the extent where no direct feedback loop is present.

Lets say the iron wire is at a sub critical state.

And it moves to a critical state when the sub atomic sub harmonic frequency is applied.

Sub because these atomic frequencies are way too high to generate, but you can use a lower frequency.
This is like pushing a kid on a swing, but only pushing the swing 1 out of five swings.
If you make sure that your push is strong enough, and contains enough energy, you can still power the swing with an increasing result.
Also remember that the target frequency can be altered by using a bias field.

Only when there is a direct feedback loop, will there be concern for a runaway event.
So that state is super critical, because there is no limiting factor.

Unfortunately the design with the 3*3 coils is the one that is so dangerous because of the direct feedback loop.
So this is why i advised to start with the basic effect,
It can be as simple as
Two coils and a magnet, and one frequency.

I would also want to refer to the carl doc.

Quote
1. When one builds a bifilar coil, using one winding for power, and one for trigger, and drive this with a transistor, there is a certain point, when you bring a magnet close to one end of the coil, you will get a loud squealing noise from the coil.
This feedback is the result of the trigger and power coil constantly switching the power transistor used to drive that coil off and on again.
It is also a point where that coil/transistor combination produce a high voltage output which one can gather from the collector of the transistor.
If left unchecked, this resonant frequency of on/off switching will burn up the transistor, and thus a resistor must be put into the trigger winding circuit to lessen the voltage produced in the winding.

So now this boils it down to two coils and a magnet and a transistor,
That is 4 parts and a power supply or battery.
It's not exactly bifilar in the same plane, but think tunnel, CRT beam, aerodynamic wing design.

The meaning in this experiment is to understand that:
* There could be a point where the frequency interacts with the electrons at the atomic level,
* Feeding them energy in their own phase,
* So that they gain kinetic energy.
* And break free from their bonds.

And that:
* The magnet is used to force them into a specific path, combining their kinetic energies.
* The magnet is also used to control the frequency.

Do you think this experiment is difficult ?

Two coils and a transistor ?

I was just waiting for one of these joule thieve enthusiasts would hit on something but it just never happened.

I'd recon the idea of the microphone that is too close to the speaker.
Everybody knows the sound of the high pitch whine that will arise.
The air between the mic and the speaker starts vibrating and the input can 'hear' the output.
And this is a type of feedback loop that is comparable in a sense that the 'frequency starts to feed itself'.
Itself, and not themselves, because there is only one in this SIMPLE experiment.
That is, until you hit the center frequency, and then you have two frequencies to work with.

Grumage

Hi Turbo.

Indeed not.

I originally joined OU.Com, under another name in 2008. Back then, heavily into the work of John Bedini.

Using his famous SSG circuit I got the effect you mention by offering a second coil and Ceramic magnet towards the bifilar sense and drive coil. The arrangement literally " squealed " audibly.

I also remember a video at the time where the guy, doing the same as I did, was literally shouting
" this is OU " over and over again.

If NMR is the " source " of excess energy then a Geiger Muller counter is a must whilst experimenting. Don't forget that they are susceptible to HF/HV interference.

Cheers Graham.