This forum is turning into trash

[lancaIV]

Raycathode :
https://nantenergy.com/zinc-air/  as info deliverer other electric storages alu-ion/lead/lithium-air/ sodium-air/.....

small user. 450 Wh per day

middle user 1000 Wh per day

heavy user 3000 Wh per day
Wh electricity consume in daily average 24 hours diagram :  breakfast lunch dinner time ( kitchen Wp )


How many different nominal Watt-loads with permanent or periodically energy demand  ?
https://www.ametherm.com/inrush-current/inverter-inrush-current-protection
"The inverter overloads in the following scenario ......." + " Solution : inrush current limiter :....."

3 times inrush current ?

Heater/filaments up to14 times !  Or up to 60 times inrush current.  : transformer  !
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current
How to calculate feedback nominal input by different Watt load and different inrush current demand. ?

If Amperage fixed and speed variable ( f. e.  washing machine : normal rotation/centrifuge) : inrush voltage/frequency. ?
Feedback cycle calculation.  ?
       
          Beginning small :


Small user : 450 Watt-hour per day  :
nominal solution example : 2 cells/capsules x 12V x 1,5 A x 24 h = 864 Wh electricity p.d. ,36 W DC delivery p.h.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19280203&CC=FR&NR=633752A&KC=A#
Costs in industrial mass production less than 2 US$ each cell/capsule


Heavy user :  3000 Watt-hours per day

industrial work-bench prototype : 1 KW magnetic flux flow amplifier
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20161013&CC=DE&NR=112014005978A5&KC=A5#

                        3000 Wh /C.O.P. 1O input /output ratio = 300 Wh electricity demand

          12 V x 1,5 A x 24 h = 432 Wh per day.  hydro-electric cell/capsule energy conversion

     
                  500 Euros for the " Heavy user"-solution is for me a little to high  ! 250 Euros "okay !"
                  To bring down the " magnetic flux flow amplifier"- production price. !
                 Nominal 1000 Watt output : 11 Kg material input a 32 Euros/ average Kg production
                 Material input weight decrease and lower material price by same safety standart and function qualty. !
                 Material change by similar specific function  by same safety standart and function quality !
                 Production costs decrease by 100% automatic production  !


                For stationary on-grid  buildings/ household the " magnetic flux flow amplifier" is the solely solution,         
               a closed cycle only a need for mobile offgrid-"micro-grids"  !

                C.O.P. 10 = 90% less on-/offgrid- electricity ( storage) demand  !


Several applications/publication since 2002 theme " amplifying"( C. O. P.  5+) related. :                                                 
                                                         1,3,4,13,14,15,16
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Tanaka+saburo&IN=&CPC=&IC=
C. O. P.  5 AC/AC : 80% less on-/off-grid electricity demand. !  KYOTO : -80% GHG 1990-2050


Carnot-cycle : inrush current factor / C. O. P.  Steady or pulsed  DC,AC,pulsed DC
Carnot-electric duty cycle circuit : real work time/real work power  calculation and measurement

[synchro1]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[synchro1]

(Schematics above)
                                                                 GAP magnet Ray

A flat "neutralization coil" placed next to the face of the axial tube magnet (The one with the wire coil) would curtail five times it's own magnet force per masking pulse and amplify the BEMF. The North Pole of the pulse coil would draw the four magnet poles into it.

The double advantage of this design is the retraction of the "Magnet ray" caused by the position of the coil's north pole behind the four crossed magnets.

Not only would the coil shunt the axial field, but any portion of the ray projected by the four crossed magnets would be reversed by the attraction to the north pole from behind.

Additionally, the strength of the magnet ray would be amplified by the pole reversal.

[synchro1]

                                                             BEMF neo magnet amplification

The movement of the combined south poles would be in the same direction upon pole reversal through the coil.

The pole reversed amplified backspike would power the "Magnet Ray" from the D.C. pulse collapse.

This EMP would pack a wallop.

[synchro1]

The wire coil and capacitor when connected by DMM electrodes reads a voltage when the "Magnet Ray" is interfered with. The inventor goes on to state that this coil can be pulsed and the pulse will oscillate the "Magnet Ray".

That coil can serve either role; Output or input.

A solenoid ferrite core masking coil, placed on the face of this magnet, would generate an amplified backspike due to the neodymium magnets. This increased power would amplify the strength of the "Magnet Ray" for an extra wallop EMP.

A Stiffler toroid bifilar style coil with bucking halve windings would generate output if focused on by the "Magnet Ray". Twin chiral "Magnet Rays" oscillated by crystal base timed transistors at 13.56 Mhz and aimed at the toroid coil from each side with opposite poles facing would generate even more output.