Simple and powerful principle

[nix85]

Can't believe that video has been around since 2012! Good catch, I might have seen that video but it didn't register in my mind at the time.

Need to start experimenting.

Yea, it's old but gold. I saw it long ago but did not fully realize it was an overunity system at the time. I already tried the basic principle with jar and water tank and of course it works as expected.

[FreeEnergy]

Yea, it's old but gold. I saw it long ago but did not fully realize it was an overunity system at the time. I already tried the basic principle with jar and water tank and of course it works as expected.

It almost was as if it was not meant for me/us to NOT understand it at that time.

[nix85]

It almost was as if it was not meant for me/us to NOT understand it at that time.

I guess so. Hoewever, i repeat once again, altho it is a beautiful principle which can offer at least 100x energy gain, it should not be used simply cause there are far better systems. But for fun, study and maybe even practical use as weight lifter or elevator, sure.

I can imagine one application could be to use it instead of cable cars. That would be quite cool.

One downside is, if a valve broke, it would create a flood with that amount of water released, but that could hardly ever happen.

[onepower]

nix85

There is no energy crisis, there is only intellectual-spiritual crisis of mankind. Like i said this is primitive principle and should not be built except maybe for fun. There are thousands of working OU principles, there are devices in every country being sold right now. It would be idiotic to say the least to build a system based on the principle and then go against lenz brute force.

Well said.

It's like were living in this new age where most people blame everyone else for there own ignorance as if they were a victim.

The fact is we are swimming in a sea of energy where perpetual motion is the norm because nobody can give even one example of something not in perpetual motion. I mean I could rest my case on that single point alone because the answer is so obvious and in our face it speaks for itself. I have hundreds of points but lo and behold it only takes one, lol.

Personally, that is my go to question and I could walk into any room full of hundreds of critics and simply ask for one example of something not in perpetual motion and they have nothing to say to me. So if any of you have an issue with stupid people just ask my question... give me one example of anything not in perpetual motion. Problem solved.

[FreeEnergy]

I was trying to think why this system would not work or at least come to a stop. Wouldn't the water eventually leak out every time an object inters the feeding tube?
But it seems like even if that was the case the output would be great enough to pump water back into the system?