Heins' new videos and few corrections

[lancaIV]

Thane Christopher Heins has to have improved this application concept


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/050484710/publication/US10103591B2?q=pn%3DUS2014111054A1

                     
because the technology only commercial save/granted for the U.S.A. market,not international valid, out U.S.A. = open source,no licence or fee paying


PRIORITY DATES !

[bistander]

Hi nix85,

I made similar observations a few months ago here, or actually over there.
http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14521-the-bistander-thread/page35#post496874

Clearly Thane has no idea what's going on.

Regards,

bi

[nix85]

Hi nix85,

I made similar observations a few months ago here, or actually over there.
http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14521-the-bistander-thread/page35#post496874

Clearly Thane has no idea what's going on.

Regards,

bi

Yea, same observation and good point.

[nix85]

I sketched what really happens when you delay induced current by 45° and clearly acceleration should not happen, even with 90° offset, nothing changes. Something else is at play.

Only if you offset the induced current by 150° or more, hopefully 180°, you should get acceleration cause only in that case coil starts to repell the magnet only after it crosses the mid point.


What is strange about this delaying of current is that when delayed current starts to flow, voltage is being induced that opposes it. Does this new voltage not cancel out the original voltage? If not, this implies inductors have "memory". Things get tricky.

[onepower]

Nix85

I got those slideshares, that is where i quote from. Point is infinite efficiency and 80% less input do NOT mix.

Did you think about what you just said?. If 100% efficiency is (input = output) or COP 1 and your input is 80% less than that then the real input is only 20% of the output. If we input 2 watts and we get 10 watts out, a 20% input, then obviously we could simply loop part of the output back to the input... you with me?.

Now pay attention because this is where I lose 99% of people. The moment we loop the circuit or close the input/output it then forms a circle which obviously has no beginning or end. Do you understand?, a circle is a closed loop having no beginning or end thus qualifies as infinite. In fact any output which exceeds the input and system losses qualifies as infinite because it is now self-sustaining. Here's the real brain fart, if you actually understand what was said above then the very notion of an input/output is rather a primitive concept isn't it?. It's not really a matter of any input vs output but how much extra or external energy the input can transform as an output which part then loops back to the input. Ergo input vs output or efficiency is a primitive concept and should be avoided.

As it were this does not actually violate the conservation of energy or mass because Feynman/Wheeler have already proven there is enough energy in a cup of empty space to boil all the worlds oceans. That's just space and all matter also holds more energy as kinetic energy than most people can imagine. So energy is the least of our problems.

What is strange about this delaying of current is that when delayed current starts to flow, voltage is being induced that opposes it. Does this new voltage not cancel out the original voltage? If not, this implies inductors have "memory". Things get tricky.

That's debatable and an opposing voltage is not always induced when a current starts to flow in a conductor. I understand the reasons why are beyond your current understanding however this may not always be the case. When I looked at this years ago I asked a simple question, under what circumstances could a current ie free electrons, be forced to move in a conductor but not develop an opposing force we call Lenz Law?. Look at all the possible ways it can happen and your half way there, it took me 3 years.