Heins' new videos and few corrections

[nix85]

...

[nix85]

I just wanted to add that correct term should be Lenz's Flaw.

[onepower]

Nix85

The question is did YOU think before you wrote that drivel. Let me paint it simple for you, overunity systems by definition do not lower but ELIMINATE need for extrnal power intput.

There is no such thing as OU because it relies on the outdated false belief of creation which is a violation of both physics and natural law... something from nothing. As well a FE system does not eliminate external power and the most common device is a partial lowering of input power.

LOL, i could have expected you are follower of that clown who claims he discovered double vortexial nature of magnetic field ahahaha, HE HAS NO SHAME. Dielectric this dielectric that, what a parrot only most ignorant can fall for.

Wow that's a lot of hate you have going on there my friend. I simply mentioned Feynman and wheeler because they both were involved in the energy calculations. So you would cherry pick a reference and go on some toxic rant?... gaslight much?.

Opposing voltage IS always induced when there is is change of flux through the conductor.

Your moving the goal posts my friend because I didn't mention or imply it occurs "when there is is change of flux through the conductor". You can't just change the rules and the narrative mid stream to make a bs point.

LOL, you remind me of myself years ago when i knew nothing but thought i knew everything. It might take you not 3 years but 3 lifetimes to get where i am at now and i have zero intention to brag.

Was that what you think I was doing, bragging?. I think it's awesome how you just said you have no intention to brag then in the same breath bragged "It might take you not 3 years but 3 lifetimes to get where i am at now". I mean you literally directly contradicted yourself in the same sentence which may be a fucking record of some sort, lol.

Even with all i know now, how to cancel lenz, how to completely neutralize it, correct structure of the cosmic forcefield, that is, 6 axis of time and how they create illusion of 3d space, 4 great subforces, imablance of speed and density of two components of the Great Light and it's omnidirectional pressure in every point of space, x49 increase of density of matter, speed of light and rate of time flow for each of 7 "physical" planes, true nature of gravity and it's polar opposite, 2 ways to degravitate matter and how to produce the polar etheric current.. things you and your idol Wheeler don't have the slightest idea about, and still i am fully aware all i know is still very limited in the infinity. You on the other hand, know NOTHING.

Wow that's a mouth full and I thought I had seen everything until I saw the term... degravitate?. So I will tell you what I'm not going to comment any more because you appear to be a special kind of crazy beyond my understanding of the term crazy. Congratulations you win, you really are a winner my friend, lol.

[nix85]

There is no such thing as OU because it relies on the outdated false belief of creation which is a violation of both physics and natural law... something from nothing. As well a FE system does not eliminate external power and the most common device is a partial lowering of input power.

No creation you say, so this material world has existence of it's own, it is not but a play of consciousness. Very good. If you count Great Light pressure as a source of energy, which it is, then i will agree there is no "overunity", since this energy is all-inclusive and it comes from Godhead.

"FE system does not eliminate external power" #facepalm

Wow that's a lot of hate you have going on there my friend. I simply mentioned Feynman and wheeler because they both were involved in the energy calculations. So you would cherry pick a reference and go on some toxic rant?... gaslight much?.

Hate and toxic rant you say Funny since your whole post was one big toxic rant  supercharged with hate, arrogance and confusion.

"They proved" lol, what did Wheeler prove, he is a clown, that is all i said and that is not hating, i actually like the guy, he's funny and could be a good comedian. But even putting his name next to Feynman is just wrong.

Don't mix somene's ability to articulate "big words" with actually understanding the subject and having deep and correct knowledge about it. I am not saying he is wrong on all points, i am saying he is lacking information.

Your moving the goal posts my friend because I didn't mention or imply it occurs "when there is is change of flux through the conductor". You can't just change the rules and the narrative mid stream to make a bs point.

"opposing voltage is not always induced when a current starts to flow in a conductor"

Opposing voltage is called back EMF and if conductor has inductance back EMF will be induced at every change of current.

Inductive reactance of the conductor (coil) grows with frequency

XL= 2πfL

Capacitive reactance falls with frequency

XC= -1/2πfC

And complex impedance is

Z = sqrt(R² + (Xc - Xl)²)

and ratio of inductance and resistance gives

τ = L/R inductor time constant, after ~5τ (transient time) current reaches 99.5%

Anyway, we are not talking about back EMF, that is, self-induction here, but normal induction by external change of flux. Only bs "point" is yours.

Was that what you think I was doing, bragging?. I think it's awesome how you just said you have no intention to brag then in the same breath bragged "It might take you not 3 years but 3 lifetimes to get where i am at now". I mean you literally directly contradicted yourself in the same sentence which may be a fucking record of some sort, lol.

"I understand the reasons why are beyond your current understanding"

"Was that what you think I was doing, bragging?"

All i did is correct your arrogant and false claim. I am not here to brag but to share and learn.

Wow that's a mouth full and I thought I had seen everything until I saw the term... degravitate?. So I will tell you what I'm not going to comment any more because you appear to be a special kind of crazy beyond my understanding of the term crazy. Congratulations you win, you really are a winner my friend, lol.

I'm sure it sounds crazy to you. Win? So you are in some kind of competition? Kid, relax.

[onepower]

Nix85

No creation you say, so this material world has existence of it's own, it is not but a play of consciousness. Very good. If you count Great Light pressure as a source of energy, which it is, then i will agree there is no "overunity", since this energy is all-inclusive and it comes from Godhead.

The problem with creation, gods or big bangs is one of cause and circular reasoning because the moment we say a god/big bang created something were then left with the question of what created the god/big bang in the first place. It is circular reasoning and the basis of logical fallacies whereby the answer is either false or not an actual answer to anything.

I think the only question we need to ask is... if creation is the norm them what created the creator?. Another creator?, what created that creator?, another creator?... Ad infinitum, Ad nauseam. At which point the whole farce simply implodes in on itself degenerating into something from nothing which is totally unacceptable.

"FE system does not eliminate external power" #facepalm

Free Energy only implies that the energy transformed has no direct cost to us like sunlight for example. We did not create the sun, or the energy from it and it costs us nothing ergo... Free Energy. I know many like to make up there own bs definitions to serve there own beliefs however the language is clear, Free(no cost to us) Energy(motion and/or form of motion).

I have been watching Thane Heinz' work from day one and it's really not that difficult to understand. It's not overunity it simply transforms part of the energy present which usually opposes the motion of the rotor before it starts opposing. Only the magnetic field component can create the rotor drag we call Lenz Law therefore reducing it seems like a pretty obvious place to start. Transform the magnetic field change component an into an electric field change before it can cause drag and Lenz Law does not apply. Do you understand?, Lenz Law is not invoked because it does not apply. For the same reasons Earnshaw's theorem does not apply to magnetically levitated tops. People need to understand what the author of any law or theorem actually said and implied before they start jumping right into wild ass speculation.