Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Wheel vs. spoke...

Started by iacob alex, January 03, 2007, 07:01:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

iacob alex

...is like a cake face to face,a piece of it.If we know a part of the pancake,we know the fully realized.A gravity engine,in a wheel concept(many alike spokes) is defined by a single spoke.This way,if we are interested to imagine, in the beginning ,then build a gravity power collector as a wheel,the first question is regardful to a single spoke.It can be,nothing more,than an arm and a mass in a "someway" motion.The only and the last question,is about this "someway" motion.Now,we can join ,this little issue:a switching mass at the end of a supporting arm.The last step-problem:how can we determine this mass to make a self-switching motion ,on the arm?At this time,we can talk,imagine,or what you need,about the one only "knotty point" of a possible gravity engine("wheel" as you like to dream up):the self motion of a working mass face to gravity and inertia...But,be carefully;the more we dream,the less we believe.A dream must be tempered with reality.Garage people know more about it.All the Bests!/Alex

iacob alex

   Thinking in a black box style,can be a provocative,stimulative and short manner to dream up about the unknown.
   This time,in the line with the topic,the black box is supposed to 'hide"  inside, a "wheel" ,or something like this.
   We know the input and the output of the black box.
   The input is the gravity,the output is hoped for a working torque.
   How  about the "wheel"?
   Here,it's  a full place for fancy,guess,suppositions...as this place and topic is intended to be.
   My opinion ,is to think big about this  "wheel".
   My  first suggestion is to imagine it,as a big-size radius mechanism,machine(as a Ferris Wheel,or better as that buildt by Aldo Costa).
   My  second suggestion is to make a big "cut" in the design:we need two spokes ,only.
   The next step is a big change in the concept:we  are  dealing not with a wheel,but with a lever(if you like more a wheel image,you can call,name this lever as a  "minimal" wheel).
   One more step,is to add,couple this one with a mechanically store-restore power system(let's say a flywheel,a pulsatory flywheel).
   The  last but one proposition, is to bring about the self switching long arm-short arm  configuration,on the same side of the fulcrum/pivot ,with the help of an incline .
   And finally,the last invitation is to leave you, unaccompanied to think about.
   So,if I completed my description in some words,I hope you can understand it,someway.
                               All  the Bests! / Alex

iacob alex


sm0ky2

Quote from: iacob alex on December 26, 2017, 02:52:45 AM
.....let's say , as : http://alphaplanets.com
     Al_ex


They claim over 3000% efficiency
They state the device is up to 97% efficient


Which is it?
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

vince

https://youtu.be/HQKEQB-IoeM


Wonder if it's the same guy? Several patents out there on the concept.